159 Comments

He's definitely controlled op. He's not an anti vaxxer either, he believes in some of them. Most people are oblivious and don't care and will go off of some emotional nostalgia because he's a "Kennedy."

Expand full comment

I think he’s legit. Just my two cents.

Expand full comment

Many of us would like for him to be. But seriously he would not be a Democratic or Republican if he were actually for the people. Those two Parties are the Left and Right wings of the same predator Beast. They all work for the Antichrist aka the Papacy..

Expand full comment

Hear you, although I believe one must be in the game to win it. He has to play within the rules if he stands a chance of changing the game. To me, his record of helping people fight against corporate abuses speaks for itself. I trust him. 😊

Expand full comment

"He has to play within the rules if he stands a chance of changing the game"

That's like thinking you can comply your way out of tyranny. Kennedy has said himself that "you cannot comply your way out of tyranny".

Watch the videos I linked in my comment to the OP. And why would you trust someone who is going to lie and deceive in order to 'play the game' to win the competition? Is he going to keep lying to us and deceiving in order to 'play the game to stay in the role? Or to stay alive(remember what happened to his father and uncle - and unlike many of his siblings and family, he knows, or at least is closer to the truth of who killed them)?

Expand full comment

What has he lied about? Playing by the rules in order to gain access, in an attempt to affect change, is not lying or deceiving. I feel that he’s the most honest of the candidates and a man of integrity. I also appreciate him calling out Dr. Mengele Fauci and the deep state and technocratic corruption. More power to him, imho.

Expand full comment

My only complaint and criticism is he refuses to look at the science that certainly does not validate “viruses.” The egregious hypocrisy being that’s precisely what he implored everyone to do on “vaccines.” That is my big problem with him, but I agree with you on your points.

Expand full comment

Totally with you about calling out Dr Death (Fauci). I give him huge kudos for that, as well as exposing vaccine dangers, as well as the work he did prior, fighting against mercury in the rivers. That is a good track record.

What he has lied about? You said "He has to play within the rules if he stands a chance" - the rules of that game that I have observed is lying and deceiving, making promises that you think are going to get you elected with no intention of fulfilling them. Lies and deceptions on both sides. The only candidate ever who might have been actually honest is Ron Paul (or maybe I just don't know the dirt on him). He dropped out after his children's lives were threatened. Which is how they keep it a SELECTION, not an ELECTION. And it's not even that because the electoral college seats the president, the people don't.

Maybe I misunderstood what you meant by "Playing by the rules in order to gain access". It sounded like an excuse for things he has said. If I'm wrong let me know what you actually meant by that.

You say you trust him. I don't understand why you would trust someone who...

1. would take away our guns (if a non-partisan bill crossed his desk asking for it)

2. mandate vaccines (if they could be shown to be safe and do more harm than good - viruses are not causing the disease the medical cartel claims, but they won't admit it and Kennedy believes their virus lies.)

3. throw climate change deniers in jail. Anyone who throws those calling out the agendas of control would also presumably censor them, even though he himself is heavily censored and complains about it (rightfully so). But he would go further than just that and imprison people who see what's going on with that psyop.

4. in a plandemic follow the pandemic preparedness protocols from the CDC, the W.H.O. and the European Medical Association, the NHS Health Service in England. Which means that he will follow these captured or corrupt from the start organizations will determine who is sick, and do things to them based on that 'diagnosis' - like quarantine, isolation. Anyone who believes in contagion, denies the body cleanses/detoxes and thinks these detox symptoms are contagious diseases is not suitable to be in a position to tell me or anyone what to do with our bodies, including quarantine and isolation.

The general perception is that RFK Jr is that he's fair, good, and honest. That he won't take people's guns away, he won't mandate vaccines, and that he won't allow censorship, he won't punish or throw people in jail for having views different from views/beliefs. All of those things are untrue - by his own words.

For sure, a huge part of this is the propaganda media machine is painting him in a certain light that is untrue based on what he has actually said (and I believe what he has said as listed in my points above). So they have huge culpability too, as they do with all these candidates.

Expand full comment

Legit what a Legit lawyer? A legit ambulance chaser? A rich-kid that became a drug-addict, but along the way managed to secure a seat on the 'bar' ( UK)

Legit? As satanic legit?

...

Let's remember here prior to JFK, there was Joe Kennedy Mafia, he ran booze, heroin, and whores and that's how the family got rich, and then&only then made the kids into something 'legit', now you can say this is how the MOB makes shit LEGIT.

Expand full comment

Are you attacking Rfkjr directly, or indirectly for the sins you say were committed by his ancestors? I think if you have specific criticisms, then by all means let us hear them. I don’t think your issues with RFKjrs ancestors are very relevant, if at all. I am pleased to hear your criticisms of him directly, and/but I don’t think his “recovered addict” status is anything but admirable. I do however hold a fierce criticism of his stance/silence on “viruses.”

Expand full comment

I'm attacking 'jeff butt hurt' a homo cuck on substack

Expand full comment

Classic subversion technique right here. Come on a forum and spread some truth that the ruling cult wants to bury, then act like a crude jackass, thus convincing all that the truths offered are in the realm of the unhinged. Nice work.

Expand full comment

Abuse just says how immature and silly you are!

Expand full comment

My 'parrot' tells me your a UNIT-8200 IDF Mossad Hasbara CUCK; Of course your being a retard, you don't know what that means.

Expand full comment

Hell yes, RFK-Jr is "Hunter Biden" in an unused condom

Expand full comment

controlled op's dont get called an anti vaxxer...name one other candidate the media demeans for being "antivax"... because hes wrong about viruses doesn't mean he's "controlled op"

Expand full comment

It's all theatre. All of the Alphabet Agencies work for the same beast system. And they monitor all social media, all the internet. Space Force

Expand full comment

He's not anti vaxxer, and he has said so over and over and over again. They are all working for the Papacy and that is the truth that no one wants to accept. The Kennedy's are Catholics and Catholics like it or not are Idol worshipers that worship the Pope whoever it is. The Papacy, the Vatican is the Synagogue of Satan.

Expand full comment

Yes they do. Look at this headline: Trump and DeSantis try to out anti-vaxx each other - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5_d0OEcCYg

Other candidates (the controlled ops) don't get called out as anti-vaxxers because they are totally onboard and owned by BigPharma - so your logic there is flawed.

Other controlled ops not running for President are Del Bigtree (who has been inciting fear about lab-leaks and gain-of-function. Dr Robert Malone, Dr Peter McCullough (still getting paid by BigHarma).

Expand full comment

trump was going to militarize the roll out of the death jab

Expand full comment

I agree. For those people who can't see him as controlled op, he will certainly be put to good use in the fake climate change agenda to enslave us. He has said that he thinks climate change deniers should be thrown in jail. But don't take my word for it, take it directly from the man himself:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2twVfyxus94

Sarah is correct, he's not an anti-vaxxer, he believes in them, he just wants vaccines to be safe. Again, don't take my word for it, listen to his own words:

https://rumble.com/v2samua-robert-f.-kennedy-jr.-summarizes-his-views-on-childhood-vaccines-in-3-minut.html

Pay particular attention to what he says at 1:20 ... I don't think we ought to be mandating medical interventions for unwilling Americans UNLESS we know... -

Keyword here being UNLESS. Unless this requirement is met. Yet every time these vaccines are released we are told they are safe and effective - thus meeting the requirement. Do you see the problem here?

I don't care if the injections are absolutely safe. I don't care if the 'infallible' top medical institutes claim they help. I will make my own decisions. Since I know that viruses don't exist and contagion is a myth, there is no reason to take even a truly safe vaccine (which will never exist either, but that's beside the point).

By his own admission Kennedy will mandate vaccines for unwilling Americans if they can be shown to be safe, and help more than harm. Of all the candidates that I know of with respect to the vaccines and mandating them, he has the best stance. But if viruses don't exist and contagion is a myth, there is no reason to mandate or take vaccines at all. Even though Kennedy's stance is better than the rest of the parasite class, it's still not good.

Not good enough, because of everything Sam and Mark and the rest of Team No Virus point out... but that is precisely why it is THE most important discussion in the medical & health realm. Because even the guy with the best stance on vaccines and mandating them will mandate vaccines if 'the science' can show they really are safe and effective. And that means forcing (or trying to) an unnecessary medical intervention on people without their consent.

He doesn't want to take anyone's guns away... but if a non-partisan bill to disarm Americans comes across his desk he will sign it. Again, this comes directly from him.

If Kennedy wins the election, he may not be getting or giving too much love to Big-Harma, but he will most definitely be working swiftly and effectively to roll in the WEF NWO climate change agenda and throwing all of us who can see through the lies in jail.

He complains about being censored from social media *- rightfully so, I'm 100% in support of him there - I disagree with things he says but I stand by his right to say them and not be censored or punished for it. But while he complains about being censored, he's talking about IMPRISONING those of us who speak out or engage in 'wrong think' about the contrived climate change hoax.

* Notice how he's heavily censored from social media, but seems to get more air-time from interviewers than any other candidate, at least in my YT feed. Including interviews in MSM, or by people who made their name and gained their audience in MSM, to the most popular podcaster in the world (Joe Rogan), to the popular Russell Brand who has more followers than I think all the main MSM networks combined.

I don't like making predictions, but I'm just going to throw it out here. If I were to bet on who the next President will be, my money is on RFK, Jr. Let's roll out the Climate Change agenda... you will own nothing, have no privacy, no vehicle, live in a 15-minute city and eat food rations created in a lab and handed out to you by the overlords. And you'll be happy...we've got a drug for that ;)

Expand full comment

There has NEVER been a need for jab mandates before, why now all of a sudden? Follow the money. It leads right back to the doorsteps of those pushing "climate emergency" bollocks. All that signed the UN "sustainable development accord have been coerced into allowing he WHO to control plandemic mandates. "They" are all complicit.

Expand full comment

It is very hard to disprove this opinion. After really admiring RFK Jr a year or 2 ago… my discernment is leading me to this train of thought, rather swiftly.

Expand full comment

Please define "controlled op".

Expand full comment

good cop, bad cop. May be overslimplified, but there you go.

Expand full comment

It’s also come out in the last week that despite claiming to be a Catholic Christian he is in reality he’s shill for Bolshevik Zionism which means to genocide Palestinian orthodox Christians and Islamic Palestinian to the full extent his belief of viruses is now A very minor ”sin”

Expand full comment

He may not be controlled opposition.... but he is ignorant of so much, and knows so much that simply is not so.

Expand full comment

More like willfully blind, and knowing which side his bread is buttered on, which makes him controlled

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

RFK-jr is an ambulance chaser a grifter (LAWYER), he makes the insurance companys & big-pharma 'whole'

"Why kill the batman/big-pharma?, he completes me" - joker

Same for RFK-jr relationship to big-pharma, they give his life purpose, he has no intention of killing his mentor.

Insurance companys , big-pharma, lawyers, this is a 3-way marriage made in hell, any of you honestly stupid enough to think that RFK-jr is going to upset the apple-cart that funds his Heroin habit??

...

Lastly, not long ago RFK-jr was a "HEROIN ADDICT", that means he's really just like Hunter Biden, just an apple that fallen close to the tree. In this case the logical is POTUS RFK-jr, make Hunter Biden his Veep.

Expand full comment

I was an active alcoholic 12 years ago. What does that make me? People get better. I have healed and dealt with my trauma. It is possible to change. Your comment is deeply offensive.

Expand full comment

If means your moron.

Had you attended any AA program, you would know the truth; The truth is to fess up what you are.

So clearly you didn't attend "AA" ( alcoholics anonymous ) program, which makes you a 'concern troll' or a liar;

A real ex-alcoholic wears his prior life on his shirt as a symbol of pride, that he fought the beast & won.

Expand full comment

Oh come on! You're being a bit hysterical aren't you! He is nothing like Hunter Biden, who is a prostitute user, on the take, and a man who makes money out of his father's name.

Kennedy kicked heroin more than 30 years ago, for goodness sake, and has made his own way in the world as a brilliant environmental lawyer. He's super fit and has a happy marriage. Controlled opposition my foot!! You're paranoid!

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Satan&Molch created USA right after 1492 the UK "ZOG" always wanted their own 'country'.

https://bilbobitch.substack.com/p/why-satan-created-the-usa-and-why

Note the Talmud says that "Jews cannot have their own country", so these satanic ZOG cannibals or now JEWS.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Your right, but please don't put any value on 'money', they WANT power 100% power.

Once you have power, you can PRINT money for "Free"

Once you have power you can fuck your neighbors wife&kids

Once you have power you can steal children, and consume their blood&organs for immortality.

Been this way forever in human culture;

Never about money. It's only about 'power'

Expand full comment
Sep 3, 2023·edited Sep 3, 2023

Why Does Pedophilia&Cannibalism Promote Psychopaths? : It's never in all human history about 'money', its always been about 'power', the power to fuck your neighbors wife&kids.

...

Hey dumb-ass, they have been in power since 5AD, but in actually since 4,000BC

MONEY did not exist, prior to 1800's as 'paper'

Surely your argument could be "GOLD", but the fact is 'wealth' has always been in "Human Slavery"

He that has the most child brides to fuck is KING of the world, in all cultures in the history of mankind;

All wars were largely looting, and kidnapping & raping;

Then&now like UK-Saudi/China-Indian today, its all about child-sex slavery ran by CIA/MOSSAD/CSB/KGB/MI5.

Expand full comment

I am in awe of the work that you and Mark do. You calmly and logically challenge science, which is what we should always do, and you are not phased by the vitriolic attacks.

I quite often quote your works, keep up the good work.

Expand full comment

I have to say that I was disappointed in his decision to run as a Democrat rather than independently. He recently met with a Rabi and made false statements concerning Israels record with regard to the brutality toward the Palestinians. His glowing review was patently false, and he must know this but is playing to the false narrative. If truth is truth, then he should not be afraid of the truth. This is also true of the false virology scam. As Dr. Sam stated he has an army of medical experts that can easily find the papers that have not followed the scientific method at all. Hell, I understood the science and I am not a medical professional, so why did he say what he said? He is a Lawyer, and now a politician. The only Lawyer I know that tells the truth is Ralph Nader. Being politically correct in running for office does not endear him to me. He has been called anti-vaccine for a long time, so why not an anti-virus. The proof is there for the reading. I cannot vote for him in good conscience because of his pretended ignorance of the above subjects. Allopathic medicine has been a fraud since the Rockefellers took control of the medical and academic fields as stated in the excellent book by Eustice Mullins, Murder by injection.

Expand full comment

The no-virus is a no-entry area for people beholden to the cult they are in.

Expand full comment

Exactly. The way RFK Jr maneuvers around this issue shows that he knows precisely where the cult's boundaries are, and he's committed to cooperating. They don't care about his advocacy for the vaccine-injured, because he fully supports the overall Rockefeller medicine agenda and monopoly. His books only spread and deepen the virology/germ theory spell holding people's minds captive. And he pays his dues by being a deranged Zionist and apartheid apologist. As Sam's piece shows, the cult's media are only pretending to go after him, and they know their attention actually makes him more popular.

Expand full comment

Another way to explain this is ZOG ( zionist occupied governents ) has been in power universal in west&east since 5AD; They stay in power by throwing shit in all directions and see what sticks

In all candidates for all offices on earth past 300 years, its a matter of fact that they were groomed by ZOG, mao, hitler, ford, hearst, rockefellers, rothschild, stalin; Every country on earth has Rothschild bank that controls that country; Russia, China, & Iran too;

...

They toss dozens of 'candidates' into the ring given the sheep/goyim a choice, nobody knows how human events change, so they cover their bets by OWNING ALL THE HORSES, its how they stay in power.

...

Just like China in 1940's when Rockefeller was running "MAO" ( groomed from 1920's ) the CIA/OSS was running 'shang-kai-shek' ( now Taiwan ), nobody knew who would win the China civil-war, so (((THEY))) owned all the horses

Just like now with PUTIN, Zelensky, Saudi, Israel, ... nobody knows the outcome, for a nuke tomorrow could change 'everything'; But what is certain no matter who is the last man standing that man is owned by ZOG.

Expand full comment

EVERY candidate is a "virus believer" but he's the only one that has spoken out about the many dangers of vaccines...now go vote for Biden

Expand full comment

Independent is really hard to get on the ballot of many states who still operate like it's the 1800s.

Expand full comment

After Biden, the Democrat will be as hard. Sanders got on and he nearly won, the immediately supported the crooked Clinton. If Kennedy were being honest as opposed to a politician, people would take him more seriously. He is being politically correct. Translation, dishonest. I would have voted for him if he had been brutally honest as was Ralph Nader, win or lose!

Expand full comment

FYI, As a former supporter of Ralph Nader I was very disappointed that he pushed the Covid injections despite being a founder of Public Citizen whose book "Worst Pills, Best Pills" at least tried to start confronting Big Pharma propaganda. I suppose that when push comes to shove, Ralph "believes" that these injections are "best" medicine.

Expand full comment

In interviews, rfk Jr pretty much says that they're gonna block him, even if he "wins". But he said that he would not endorse Biden or whoever else, unlike Bernie sheepdog Sanders who sits on the fence and sells out for cheap lol.

It would be funny to see the DNC look like ass holes after they do this to rfk Jr. I think it would destroy their legitimacy in the eyes of US citizens.

Perhaps that is his plan, and I hope in that case he still runs as Indy, perhaps with the libertarian party or green party, both of which have decent ballot access.

Expand full comment

I would also add that RFK Jr supported Hillary too.

" He is being politically correct. Translation, dishonest."

You've got that right.

Expand full comment

Presidents of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION are selected by the Pope, not elected by the people. You vote at the poles because they are taking a poll. That's all it is and all its ever been since at least the mid to late 1800's.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/2diLMjfJH4Ph/

Expand full comment

still got to read that one, thanks

Expand full comment

We're victims of the Israeli/Talmudic choke hold on American society. Never forget the fate of the USS Liberty, 911, and a host of Tribe favoring legislation. Despite serious questions about many issues like the Holocaust, the scales are tipped against America as well as many other places like European nations like Germany. Bobby, like Ron DeSantis, appears in some sort of infatuation with Israel, things they'd rather not talk about. Bibi is on record for favoring subjugation and destruction of America, what more do we need to substantiate their utter hatred of America? Never forget the words of the great orator and statesman, the Roman Cicero, when he described those individuals that were guilty of action against the Roman republic, the insiders who were far more likely to sabotage Rome from inside rather than outside. The Biden administration is our greatest destroyer of American society and culture, what could be more obvious? Ol' decrepit Joe hates America and loves corruption, Joe's gotta go.

Expand full comment

Yes Michael you must be referring to this Cicero quote...

"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself."

Marcus Tullius Cicero

Expand full comment

The Guardian of All Things by Michael S. Malone. Cicero figures notably in his discussion of memory through the ages, due to the long oratories that made Cicero famous. Worthy book.

Expand full comment

Excellent report thank you.

Expand full comment

I come at this subject as a former US Counter intel professional. I agree 1000% with Dr Sam Bailey. I was in South America and observing the Covid op growing from Sept of 2019 with the banking REPO program. Then Oct 18th both Event 2O1 and the Wuhan military games were rolled out together. My confusion was eliminated when in the early spring I finally was able to identify Covid as a category black op which is always 95% disinformation. But who's operation was it? On 3-20-20, Mike Pompeo the former CIA director announced that the operation was now a live exercise. Live exercise is defined by NATO as: a live exercise (LIVEX) in which forces actually participate... It told me instantly that it was our own US DOD black op exercise. We were trained to detect and counter such operations to protect the US. The key to success for a black op is control and protection of the false narrative. The key part of this false narrative is the release and existence of a deadly biological virus from a Wuhan lab. All of which is disinformation and created decades prior to the actual rollout of the op. The threat of biological warfare is always better than the actual execution. Why use some weapon that is costly and impossible to control, that can kill your own people, when you can safely simulate the same thing. The key to ending similar future operations is to end the false narrative in which they are based upon. Godspeed to Dr Sam Bailey and the rest of those fighting to spread the light of truth and put an end to future medical black, grey and white psyops against our families, friends and loved ones around the world.

Expand full comment

I have a feeling that he knows something is not right about virology, but he's the type that plays it safe after seeing what happened to Trump when he let out some truths (by accident lol).

I think he's one of the few human beings that ever ran for office. Most of them are basically sociopaths who don't even know how much a bill costs because they live in a bubble.

Expand full comment

One can assume that if he wrote a forward to "Virus Mania", he read the book and "knows something is not right about virology". I agree with Jon Rappoport who understands that if Robert Kennedy Jr. introduced the no-virus idea during his candidacy, that would be the only thing that would be discussed, he would be branded a mentally-ill anti-science Flat Earther and that would be the excuse to completely cancel him.

Expand full comment

Of course he would be branded that way, that is what Fakenuuz(tm) does. Their method is to use repetition of the Big Lie billions of times to generate “hoax consensus.” The counter method is to use truth to cut directly through the confusion and teach people how to ask questions so they can spot when they are being “conned” with “appeals to ‘authority’ “ (Jon Rappaport sez so) and “buzzword-based sophistry “Flat-earther!! Anti-vaxxer!! Global-warmer!!”hopefully before they are damaged by the trap.

Expand full comment

The Kennedy bloodline is a dynasty of millionaires. THEY ARE DANGEROUS PEOPLE, NOT TRUSTWORTHY. "Bobby" is ALL IN FOR VAXX, AND ALL OF THEM.

IT´S CONTROLLED OPPOSITION.

LET HIM MUMBLE TO HIMSELF IN HIS BROKEN WAY, LISTEN NOT.

Expand full comment

Hmm. My gut tells me Bobby Jr is legitimate. If he were CO, I think they’d give him better coverage instead of the usual cancellation.

Expand full comment

What, then, does your gut say about his pro-vaxx statements?

Expand full comment

Thanks. I have also enjoyed Brett Weinstein on Darkhorse since the beginning of this madness, he and his wife, Heather, are extremely informative. (PhD microbiologists.) Like many who are against the covid kill plandemic, they are not totally anti-vaxx, but that doesn’t make them controlled opposition.

Expand full comment

Could that possibly be because neither Brett nor Heather belong to a family dynasty?

Educate yourself on the Kennedys, their bloodline, and you may understand what I mean.

Thanks.

Expand full comment

My take is that since the “cabal” has assassinated the Kennedys, the Kennedys must be the good guys. “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” philosophy.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Personally, I don’t feel it’s helpful to go on the attack and “rip” anyone “a new one”, per se. At least not the people who are on our side, we may not agree 100%, but we agree who the “enemy” is. Peace.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Thank you, Sam, for mentioning the typos and broken links in Mark’s fantastic essay--which Steve Falconer is currently releasing as a three part series on the @spacebusters Bitchute channel.

I too had only seen these trivial nitpicks mentioned as criticism, but it’s reassuring to see you acknowledging them, even if they don’t alter the information presented one bit.

Expand full comment

If Unz has a background in Theoretical Physics then he is already well versed in pseudo-science. If RFK exposes the viruses hoax he'll be JFK'd.

Expand full comment

I won’t clutter Sam’s Substack with the details now, but there are various theories about JFK’s demise also being an elaborate ritualistic hoax. All the world’s a stage etc.

Expand full comment

For sure, 100% he's a Freemason - the whole family is in the lodge.

Expand full comment

I find it quite ironic that Eric Coppolino... a practicing "ASTROLOGER"...is a member of the "no virus" camp because there's no scientific proof of "viruses"...where's his scientific proof that "astrology" is a proven..."whatever"?... as for Kennedy at least he's the ONLY presidential candidate that has even mentioned the many dangers of vaccines AND exposed the evil deeds of Fauci Gates Big Pharma the FDA and CDC...I have many disagreements with Kennedy...like his views on Israel...but given the choice between him and dementia Joe and Donald "warp speed" Trump its a no brainer...peace

Expand full comment

So don't "choose" any.

Elections are a farce. They maintain the illusion of "democracy" and "choice". It's Hobson's choice. Blackrock and Vanguard own the political parites, just like they own the majority of almost everything else.

Oh, and Mr Trump is STILL a reality TV star - just like the rest of the political cast.

Bread and circus...

Expand full comment

"Elections are a farce. "

More to the point: elections are immoral. When you 'vote' (political not talent contest) you are voting for someone to initiate force against your neighbours on your behalf - as your representative.

But you (the voter) do not have the moral right to force your neighbour to obey or fund your own personal policies and social programs. Therefore you cannot outsource a right that you don't have to begin with onto a third party.

Expand full comment

forcing people to get injected with experimental vaccines is immorality on STEROIDS...the elections are going to take place regardless of our feelings about their morality so which candidate do you think the powers that be dont want elected....take your time

Expand full comment

I agree that the elections are rigged and that voting probably doesn’t make much decisions to the end result.

But I don’t think that voting implies any form of consent to be governed. At least I haven’t reached that conclusion yet.

I would rather have RFK jr over any other candidate, even if he is very imperfect.

Expand full comment

Exactly, this whole lesser of two or three evils is complete bullshit. you do not even get into the position to run for office unless you are owned.

Expand full comment

agreed...BUT the elections are still gonna take place...so you can have dementia joe vaccine pusher Biden or Donald fast tracker Trump or Kennedy...choose wisely

Expand full comment

All of them are actors, the people never win .That is the game played by all gov't.

Expand full comment

I agree...but someone is going to get elected as "president" regardless of our feelings about "elections"...now who do you think is the last candidate Black Rock wants to hold that post? take your time

Expand full comment

All the candidates have their role to play.

The game is to keep us participating, and believing in the electoral system. To keep validating and legitimising it.

Just write on the ballot, "I do not consent".

People/businesses can also join and refuse to pay tax. The people's way to refuse to supply the government who represent corporations (WEF allies), and not we the people.

They rule by our consent.

Expand full comment

so give me your estimate on how long it will take to convince the population to go along with your grand scheme to "not consent"... if the majority actually took part in getting the covidiot clot shots it doesn't bode well that you will be able to convince them to "not consent"...in the mean time you may want to build a log cabin in a very remote location just in case...wishing you the best

Expand full comment

From little things, big things grow...😊

Expand full comment

What I liked about Kennedy's book is how he described Fauci's plan to create viruses in order to save his organization as it had no purpose after most infectious diseases had been conquered by improvements to diet, refrigeration, sanitation, food handling and the rest of 20th Century's improvements in health that vaccines had nothing to do with.

Expand full comment

So if a pathogen is a disease causing particle, why can't there exist synthetic pathogens/poisons/toxins that have in deed been created by government labs to "infect" people and kill them? It has long been admitted and well-documented that what are being called "bioweapons" are not living things nor do they come from nature but are chemical compounds intentionally created to poison people under the guise of enemy warfare. These poisons have been patented and created in labs around the world for many years. I hope you will consider the possibility that human made poisons are in deed disease-causing pathogens. They are commonly called "viruses" in order to continue the toxic narrative, fear porn and get the masses to believe in the unseen killer germ. I understand and revere your work on disproving the virus hoax. It might just be a matter of semantics or more blatant propaganda. We are not falling for it thanks to your brilliant and fearless work exposing the lies. Blessings on you and yours.

Expand full comment

Tis a tangled web indeed, and I don't fault your confusion. Bottom line is that no scientific study has been able to cause disease ("infect") by exposing any living organism to either so-called "virus" or to bacteria. Nor, as you know, has any so-called "virus" been successfully isolated/purified. Not trying to be rude, just making a point, but given that context, the concept of synthetic pathogens is the equivalent of synthetic unicorns. Now, non-living poisons and toxins abound, and they can easily be synthesized and chemically altered. All vaccines fall into that category, and I'm ashamed to say I spent 15yrs training young scientists to make those toxic compounds for Big Pharma. Particle as a concept confuses me- I think we did used to say "viral particle" in the lab, but normally we used more specific terms such as cell membrane debris or extracellular vesicle, and not the amorphous term, "partlcle" which has no single specific scientific definition. Blessings and continued health to you and yours.

Expand full comment

Great job, Sam, in dismantling not only the official virology dogma about both COVID and AIDS, but also the half-truth critiques of that dogma by Ron Unz and RFK Jr, which uphold the core aspects of that dogma while pretending to be strong dissents against it.

RFK Jr is invested in the official narrative in all sorts of ways. Oh, critical of the shots, and lockdowns,.... but insistent upon the basic validity of the con job "Pandemic"/"COVID-19"/"SARS-Cov-2” narrative mega-fraud, which has enabled the coverup of mass murder committed even before the shots and of tyranny, and of further endeavors like Operation "Pandemic."

He is ideologically committed to Contagion/Germ Theory fraud. He believes in that theory and simply thinks there usually are "better ways to handle contagion" than shots.

He's emotionally committed to it because he's put out this message over and over, including the very title of the first chapter of his "Fauci" book, "Mismanaging the Pandemic" and the entire content of his new book, coming out next month, about "lab leak bio weapon." At this point, renouncing that notion means admitting he's been less than truthful for a long time.

And he is financially invested, as are his benefactors like Steve Kirsch, be it in "alternative treatments for COVID" (Kirsch's COVID Early Treatment Fund) or his investments via Vantage Point Capital Investments (he was a partner) in various aspects of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. He has hired Charles Eisenstein as an official "philosopher" of his campaign, a man who works with Celo, a major promoter of 4IR. The "truth candidate"? What a sick joke.

Expand full comment

The trouble is placebo=reality. Back in the day, I knew of a case of a guy from Haiti who apparently died because he believed he'd had some kind of curse put on him. Belief can be self-fulfilling.

Expand full comment

Thank you Sam

One of your commenters on your home page, Marklan Linnemeyer says:

“It makes my day to know the Baileys are visiting the Unz Review!”

Yep – I second that, especially the whole ’American Pravda’ series. Ron Unz has a very specific style whereby he starts without an opinion and let’s his exhaustive reading guide him.

I’m afraid I lost all confidence and interest in RFK Jr some while ago.

Expand full comment