More to the point: elections are immoral. When you 'vote' (political not talent contest) you are voting for someone to initiate force against your neighbours on your behalf - as your representative.
But you (the voter) do not have the moral right to force your neighbour to obey or fund your own personal policies a…
More to the point: elections are immoral. When you 'vote' (political not talent contest) you are voting for someone to initiate force against your neighbours on your behalf - as your representative.
But you (the voter) do not have the moral right to force your neighbour to obey or fund your own personal policies and social programs. Therefore you cannot outsource a right that you don't have to begin with onto a third party.
forcing people to get injected with experimental vaccines is immorality on STEROIDS...the elections are going to take place regardless of our feelings about their morality so which candidate do you think the powers that be dont want elected....take your time
"Elections are a farce. "
More to the point: elections are immoral. When you 'vote' (political not talent contest) you are voting for someone to initiate force against your neighbours on your behalf - as your representative.
But you (the voter) do not have the moral right to force your neighbour to obey or fund your own personal policies and social programs. Therefore you cannot outsource a right that you don't have to begin with onto a third party.
forcing people to get injected with experimental vaccines is immorality on STEROIDS...the elections are going to take place regardless of our feelings about their morality so which candidate do you think the powers that be dont want elected....take your time
I agree that the elections are rigged and that voting probably doesn’t make much decisions to the end result.
But I don’t think that voting implies any form of consent to be governed. At least I haven’t reached that conclusion yet.
I would rather have RFK jr over any other candidate, even if he is very imperfect.