So if a pathogen is a disease causing particle, why can't there exist synthetic pathogens/poisons/toxins that have in deed been created by government labs to "infect" people and kill them? It has long been admitted and well-documented that what are being called "bioweapons" are not living things nor do they come from nature but are chemi…
So if a pathogen is a disease causing particle, why can't there exist synthetic pathogens/poisons/toxins that have in deed been created by government labs to "infect" people and kill them? It has long been admitted and well-documented that what are being called "bioweapons" are not living things nor do they come from nature but are chemical compounds intentionally created to poison people under the guise of enemy warfare. These poisons have been patented and created in labs around the world for many years. I hope you will consider the possibility that human made poisons are in deed disease-causing pathogens. They are commonly called "viruses" in order to continue the toxic narrative, fear porn and get the masses to believe in the unseen killer germ. I understand and revere your work on disproving the virus hoax. It might just be a matter of semantics or more blatant propaganda. We are not falling for it thanks to your brilliant and fearless work exposing the lies. Blessings on you and yours.
Tis a tangled web indeed, and I don't fault your confusion. Bottom line is that no scientific study has been able to cause disease ("infect") by exposing any living organism to either so-called "virus" or to bacteria. Nor, as you know, has any so-called "virus" been successfully isolated/purified. Not trying to be rude, just making a point, but given that context, the concept of synthetic pathogens is the equivalent of synthetic unicorns. Now, non-living poisons and toxins abound, and they can easily be synthesized and chemically altered. All vaccines fall into that category, and I'm ashamed to say I spent 15yrs training young scientists to make those toxic compounds for Big Pharma. Particle as a concept confuses me- I think we did used to say "viral particle" in the lab, but normally we used more specific terms such as cell membrane debris or extracellular vesicle, and not the amorphous term, "partlcle" which has no single specific scientific definition. Blessings and continued health to you and yours.
So if a pathogen is a disease causing particle, why can't there exist synthetic pathogens/poisons/toxins that have in deed been created by government labs to "infect" people and kill them? It has long been admitted and well-documented that what are being called "bioweapons" are not living things nor do they come from nature but are chemical compounds intentionally created to poison people under the guise of enemy warfare. These poisons have been patented and created in labs around the world for many years. I hope you will consider the possibility that human made poisons are in deed disease-causing pathogens. They are commonly called "viruses" in order to continue the toxic narrative, fear porn and get the masses to believe in the unseen killer germ. I understand and revere your work on disproving the virus hoax. It might just be a matter of semantics or more blatant propaganda. We are not falling for it thanks to your brilliant and fearless work exposing the lies. Blessings on you and yours.
Tis a tangled web indeed, and I don't fault your confusion. Bottom line is that no scientific study has been able to cause disease ("infect") by exposing any living organism to either so-called "virus" or to bacteria. Nor, as you know, has any so-called "virus" been successfully isolated/purified. Not trying to be rude, just making a point, but given that context, the concept of synthetic pathogens is the equivalent of synthetic unicorns. Now, non-living poisons and toxins abound, and they can easily be synthesized and chemically altered. All vaccines fall into that category, and I'm ashamed to say I spent 15yrs training young scientists to make those toxic compounds for Big Pharma. Particle as a concept confuses me- I think we did used to say "viral particle" in the lab, but normally we used more specific terms such as cell membrane debris or extracellular vesicle, and not the amorphous term, "partlcle" which has no single specific scientific definition. Blessings and continued health to you and yours.