109 Comments

Tribes of historians have had quite the pow wow with this “Running Bull“ shit story of infected blankets wiping out native peoples. Chief Bailey‘s taken this old chestnut to Germ Theory‘s last stand at the Battle of Little Fear Porn -and scalped it properly!! If there are any more campfire tales to smoke out, you can bet the Bailey clan will tomahawk them with the precision of a seasoned warrior!! Their raid on this myth will send every fear-monger on a long trail of tears.

Expand full comment

It's challenging to even approach those that are still in the world of make-believe with these new ideas. The indoctrination is a solid foundation. Heck, I was one of them. It took the scam of 2020 to begin the dismantling of my belief system. Kind of like my own intervention!

Expand full comment

So, the game is the same as always: Instead of claiming responsibility and talk about, who killed the native populations, the perpetrators makes it into a what. Isn't that the game with modern medicine, which is more population control than actually health care? A bunch of corrupt criminal billionaires and the even more corrupt organization, that they created and still fund, WHO, see the population rate as big treat and they release weapons of mass destruction and blame it all on an invisible germ. Don't even stop at all the COVID 19 nonsense: What about the entire cancer industry today, which is simply and purely a hugely lucrative way of killing people every year in millions, and strangely especially targeting the already elderly or otherwise weak, who are called out as "the elder burden". My great weak up were House of Numbers and also a double agenda debunk in the fun fact, that the Vikings from Norway and Denmark (I am a Dane) settled on the Southeast of Greenland a millennia ago, build a for the time huge settlement counting at least 6000 people, and build houses and churches in stone, which still can visited. Their main products were food and fur, so they build a thriving farming settlement, were farming is hardly a thing even today, at the peak of global warming and man made climate change. It was a warm period on the Northern hemisphere then, that's why they could. Did reindeer farts create a warmer climate? They also exported their produce to the growing cities in Europe, but that entire society fell apart, coincidentally at the little ice age period, when also the plaque occurred all over Europe. The plaque were not a virus either, but widespread famine all over Europe, paired with very dense cities with no sanitation, poor water ressources. Basically, malnutrition in a very toxic environment.

Expand full comment
Oct 29·edited Oct 29

Dr. Sam, I believe the globalist needed to get rid of the natives because they know the laws of nature! That's when everyone was forced to go from hunter gatherer to mass agriculture! What they did to our beautiful indigenous people in Canada is nothing short of barbaric! This murdering of native people of the world was a planned annihilation by the globalist according to historian author Dean Henderson❤❤👍💪🤔 Love from Canada. Big Respect. Sue we love you and your no-poo shampoo😉👋🌄

Expand full comment

This indeed true , so here I would like to introduce "another theory " that has merit. Along with warfare, , enslavement , starvation, engineered famine, and outright poisoning, [JUST LIKE NOW.] I would consider the effects of consciousness , hatred, racial despise, RELIGIOUS ZEALOTRY demanding "conversion" or death. Judgement against indigenous people as "soulless heathens, as a REAL FACTOR , Consciousness is REAL , human resonance is REAL, the effects of these on human terrain, spiritual, emotional ,physiologically , should not be ignored .

Expand full comment

What Killed the Native Populations?

"Government"

Expand full comment

I'd love to see a control for 'infected blankets'! 😂

Expand full comment

It seems that most people (at least for now) find it easier to intellectually accept that they "caught" a disease from someone else via a microbe transmission than it is to accept the somewhat more complex idea of their terrain vs the environment created an imbalance or toxic condition. My older brother returned recently from a cruise and tested positive (I know, that's a whole 'nother kettle of fish) for Covid, while his wife did not (which he found puzzling), so he sent me an article saying that older people (we're both in our 70s) should get the new C-vax and then the booster within 6 months later, which i found quite disappointing because he's not stupid, and I would have thought he'd have at least started to suspect the hoax over that last few years, but alas... he's proving the following meme:

"Imagine living through the last 3 years and still not being even the slightest bit suspicious."

Expand full comment

One plausible explanation I heard for a whole Native American village falling ill at the same time (in North Dakota or Montana) was the use of arsenic in treating animal hides harvested by trappers. The treatment solution was disposed of in a river, so those downstream got hefty doses of arsenic every so often.

Expand full comment
Oct 31·edited Oct 31

Very interesting! Sally Fallon Morell of the Weston A. Price Foundation has written an article in which she suggests that arsenic is the true cause of anthrax, not the bacterium Bacillus anthracis.

From the article: The symptoms of arse­nic poisoning are remark­ably similar to those of “anthrax,” including the appearance of black skin lesions. Like anthrax, arse­nic can poison through skin contact, through inhalation and through the gastroin­testinal tract. If an injection contains arsenic, it will cause a lesion at the site.

https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/anthrax-arsenic-and-old-lace/#gsc.tab=0

Expand full comment

Funny thing is that I was, and technically still am, an expert in this field. My PhD from Princeton in early American history and literature (1997), with my research done at Harvard, licensed me to speak with authority on this topic. But every year I’ve become less certain of the things I thought I knew. Graham Hancock and Thor Heyerdahl have never had doctorates, but they know or knew way more about this sort of thing than I do. I’m gradually re-learning everything.

Expand full comment

see my reply above and below and consider it as a possible factor , let me know your thoughts

Thomas Guitarman

Thomas’s Substack

just now

This indeed true , so here I would like to introduce "another theory " that has merit. Along with warfare, , enslavement , starvation, engineered famine, and outright poisoning, [JUST LIKE NOW.] I would consider the effects of consciousness , hatred, racial despise, RELIGIOUS ZEALOTRY demanding "conversion" or death. Judgement against indigenous people as "soulless heathens, as a REAL FACTOR , Consciousness is REAL , human resonance is REAL, the effects of these on human terrain, spiritual, emotional ,physiologically , should not be ignored .

Expand full comment

Curiously, neither did the people who built Angkor Wat or the European cathedrals.

The people who built the UofT library *did* have PhDs... you can judge the outcome for yourself...

Expand full comment

Lol. That U of T library's that monstrous ugly thing, if memory serves. Didn't students call it the goose or duck or something?

As for the European cathedrals and Angkor Wat: I know, right? What the actual heck. How did those things happen?

Expand full comment

Did you see what they did to the Royal Ontario Museum?

I'm never going back to Canada -- pity, because around the time of Ben Johnson (the real 1988 100m Champ) and Alex Baumann I really thought it was the best country in the world. The nature's nice, but I can go to India for similar mountains and streams.

Expand full comment

Well , we are rapidly sinking into the dark middle ages . Perhaps next time enlightenment comes around , people will understand this.

There is mainly one thing to fear - that would be fear it self. This certainly is becoming apparent these days.

Thank you , Sam

Expand full comment

Unfortunately, Enlightenment is the problem. Every consequence of the Enlightenment has been disastrous for humanity.

Expand full comment

Great job, Dr Sam Bailey.

The "infected blankets" and similar narratives are deeply woven into the false histories which are fed a propagandized global population, be it books, movies,.... They also play a key role in what purport to be critical narratives. And they are even a key part of science fiction, the the common cold killing off the Martian invaders in War of the Worlds. Saying this is hard to root out is an understatement.

And attacks upon those who try from the perspective of "you're in denial of racism" serve as a conformism reinforcement tool, amazingly just like those who attacked criticism of the official 9/11 narrative regarding what happened to the WTC towers by claiming that "you are denying the ability of nonwhite people to carry out sophisticated military operations," when in fact the critics' point was that no one could knock down the towers using planes.

So many layers of deception to counteract. Thanks for doing way more than your share!

Expand full comment

Planes were not used to knock down those towers, placed controlled demolition, DEW s were no planes ever hit them or building 7 or Pentagon

Expand full comment

No one ever claimed a plane hit WTC7, not even the official story. Planes hit WTC1 and 2, but most likely not airliners, and that;s not why the towers fell. An airliner did not hit the Pentagon, and the damage to the building and the deaths/injuries were in areas away from where the flying object impacted, indicating explosions were the reason. DEW notion fails some basic evidence tests. especially the fact that the antenna on top of WTC1 started moving downward before the top section (above the impact zone) did so. This required the destruction of the truss hat which supported the antenna, but it happened without any external damage showing. A DEW could not do that. See around 57:00 of this video.

https://richardgage911.substack.com/p/the-smoking-gun-of-irrefutable-evidence

Expand full comment

Im aware no one claimed any planes hit no 7 but they did claim planes hit twin towers , and Pent. dont think so and I ALSO SAID CONTROLLED DEMOLITION charges inside which does explain the antenna the Hutchinson effect does explain the pulverization evident I think we are seeing multiple ways.

Expand full comment

Judy Wood, whom i used to talk to almost daily from June 2006 to January 2008, posed the Hutchinson Effect to me back then. It is BS. Her thesis of DEW failed numerous tests, including the massive presence of structural steel at the WTC site, evidence she dismissed as "fake."

Expand full comment

Sam, excellent video. Just the right amount of fact, humor and "snarkiness" to help us understand the absurdity of what we have been led to believe causes sickness. Will continue to pray for your family's health and hedge of protection. God bless!

Expand full comment

Israel is trying to same stunt, blaming, so-called polio on viruses run amok rather than the fact that they have been starving the Palestinians for many many months now and making them live in filthy toxic conditions under constant terror of bombardment

Expand full comment

And to add insult to injury they started a vaccination campaign against the fake polio virus. They’ve also banned UNRWA from providing medical aide and assistance to those suffering in Gaza. Talk about satanic.

Expand full comment

Yes, would you take a shot from a bunch of psychopaths Who’ve been trying to murder you and your family for the last year? I can’t think of a more brilliant way to start a “epidemic” and then blame their democide un contagion

Expand full comment

They are free to leave at any time. Oddly, none of their Muslim terrorist brethren countries want them.

Expand full comment

🤮👎👎👎

Expand full comment

It’s truly sad that the vast majority of people are brainwashed to Zionism. It is abundantly clear that the IDF killed their own people during the nova Concert shooting their cars up with Apache 30 caliper rounds and how far missiles and then bearing the cars, the evidence immediately. This obviously was done too attempt to justify their actions in Gaza by slaughtering, non-combatives, men, women, children, old people and unborn daily basis to steal their land into build a city ultimately. anyone thinking from pure reasoning, logic could come to no under other conclusion.

Expand full comment

30 caliber chain, gun, hell, fire missiles

Expand full comment

Smart city

Expand full comment

They call it the Simpson protocol

Expand full comment

Did you cover the possible infestation of blankets with 'bed bugs' or mites?

Again, I don't know the details involved with such claims but that is one of the claims that is usually thrown around to suggest some form of contamination was present.

Also, I don't know what the supposed effects of encountering new parasites are. Can bed bugs even produce a reaction as severe as the one attributed to smallpox?

Expand full comment

That'll be a first. Catching smallpox from bed bugs! Talk about making the narrative fit at all costs 😂 New parasites?! I would recommend studying the Bailey's backlog of work.

Expand full comment

'smallpox' is a symptom. I think Tsubion is saying that maybe the blankets were infested with a new (to the natives) biting insect, and the natives got bitten all over with welts (and maybe massive inflammatory reactions to the bites) and this was called 'smallpox.' Not necessarily that that the bugs 'transmitted' 'smallpox' 'virus.' I think it's a good hypothesis. Biting insect parasites are real, but 'viruses' are not.

Expand full comment

I'm sure that bed bugs are found everywhere.

New hypothesis:

AZTECS WIPED OUT DUE TO NOT CHANGING BED SHEETS FREQUENTLY.

Expand full comment

Fleas too

Expand full comment

Not sure that bedbug bites are inflamed due to "infection with parasites".

Expand full comment

It's amazing to me the incredible BS we've been and are being told by "medical professionals."

It's surprising they aren't selling bridges as well. It's even more surprising that soooo many people not only BELIEVE the BS, but insist to others that they should believe it, too.

Expand full comment

Q A Person gets on an airplane for short flight and is in good health, however by the time that person arrives at their destination they are no longer in perfectly good health but is coughing has a runny nose and the works.

So what happened to suddenly develop this condition?

Expand full comment

This has happened to me several times since I flew quite a lot at one point in my life. The person gets on the plane, they are exposed to a change in air pressure imposed by the cabin pressure, a massive increase in air dryness and quite a significant drop in temparature. The nose responds to the pressure + temparature changes and dryness by producing more mucous and the lungs respond similarly, exactly as they would when air pressure and temparature changes due to a change in season (the nose and lungs produce mucous as a response to changes in air quality since gases can only cross cell membranes when they are dissolved in water or an aqueous solution, thus the lung surface must be moist). Voilà, you get a seasonal 'cold', since the temparature and pressure changes are identical to those caused by seasonal changes. For neither of these mechanisms do you need a pathogen and for neither did you need to be 'infected' beforehand by anything.

Expand full comment

That makes a lot of sense thank you.

Expand full comment

see my reply above

Expand full comment

Don’t forget that on aeroplanes, there is filtered air, or to put it bluntly, denatured air in the form of oxygen which is air with the water stripped away, this denatured air dries out the lining of the nose and lungs and from there your body fights to re-saturate = body stress and detoxification

Expand full comment

AND, when you fly you spend a lot of time in airport buildings, some of the most EMF-polluted, unnatural light, artificial everything. That could be just as harmful as the actual airplane.

Expand full comment

The same thing as if that person had stayed at home... a seasonal detox.

Or... that person maybe has a sensitivity to environmental chemicals present along the route.

Answer this question?

Why doesn't everyone using public transport get sick from all the sneezers and coughers that 'pollute' these environments?

Why didn't everyone get sick from COVID when everyone was still supposedly lacking immunity to this 'rapidly spreading dangerous pathogen?'

Expand full comment

I never had Covid injections, I never had Covid . I worked in the nursing home where many get flu symptoms . I still never got Covid. I worked as a cleaner and have been in public places and cleaning homes of other people, holiday houses and holiday parks. I still didn’t get Covid. The only time I have flu symptoms is when my young son come home from day care with flu symptoms then would share the symptoms with us. But very rarely I get flu symptoms. If I do I recover quickly.

I’m 47 now and I don’t take any regular medications. I don’t have any major health issues.

I have come to decide that I don’t believe in virus theory.

Expand full comment

Make your mind up. On the one hand you say you shared flu symptoms with your son. Then you end by saying you don't believe the virus theory. Which is it ?

Expand full comment

Derek Curtis & Anen Allidnab , RE: Derek's "Which is it ?" We have an issue of language, where 'flu' as a word is captured by big pharma. I grew up with a Scot-British grandmother who used the word 'flu' related to 'Flues', air ducts or 'drafts', are critical in systems where toxic fumes are generated during heating or cooling. These gases are vented outdoors through the ducts, ensuring safety and proper air quality. If your HVAC system does not recycle returned air, it may utilize a flue to expel air outside.

i.e. My grandmother or mother would say, "Don't sit by the flue or in an air 'draft' or you will get sick."

So flu or viruses as entities are unidentified, inappropriately tested & improperly posed as 'medical-physiology' & may not even exist in any sense, but have become part of a pharma profit driven industry-induced popular lexicon. So to even speak about these concepts of sickness from unidentified or multiple environmental & internal-body factors, we still use these words. Drs. Sam & Mark Bailey aren't saying that the sickness we experience doesn't exist, but that we haven't identified the cause in any replicable scientific sense. Thanks to Drs. Sam, Mark & such as Dr. Tom Cowan for being true to scientific process. HOLISTIC SCIENCE https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/d-participatory-structure/6-holistic-science UNDOING FALSE-SCIENCE https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/a-home/9-undoing-false-science

Expand full comment

No issue of language with Anen and myself. When we used the word flu, we both obviously used it as short for influenza. I find it hard to believe that you couldn't see that.

Expand full comment

Derek A pleasure to read your thoughts. Thanks for your definition clarification, as well as what you believe Anen's interpretation is of 'flu' as in to 'catch the flu'. What will Anen's definition be?

Because of Drs. Sam & Mark Bailey, Dr Tom Cowan & such as Kerry Mullis PhD (PCR) on the fake HIV, with the network, they've put together, I've been able to understand the fakery in 'Virus' & 'Virology' as well as 'flu' & 'influenza'. Over the past 39 years, working with folks having various kinds of Autism, Children's Health Defence & Robert F Kennedy Jr. (JFKJr's Zionist insults against Palestinians are unbearable) have helped me understand the fakery of Vaccine.

Expand full comment

Early this year on a bus journey, I got chills from an open window draft. This, the following day, had manifested into flu like symptoms. Avoid a drafty environment, this can include air conditioning, which I have felt whilst flying.

Expand full comment

I find it hard to believe that the same person would also have become ill if they had stayed at home, somehow I'm convinced that it has to be related to the journey on an airplane.

Haven't used public transport in years.

Didn't buy into the Covid fear campaign however I did get seriously i'll but blamed that on being forced to wear a scientifically meaningless mask.

Expand full comment

I stayed at home by myself for the first 3 weeks of Covid lockdown. My house is located in a relatively clean air part of Ireland. It is detached and the garden is large. No one came into the house or even close to the house. My shopping was dropped at the doorstep. At the start of week 3, I became quite unwell with a temp and flu like symptoms. I was ill for a week. How does one explain that??? After that, I gave up on the 'measures' and decided we were being had! Then, I found the Baileys on germ theory...and voilà! I had my explanation.

Expand full comment

Flying by plane is an awful way to travel, e.g. recycled air, cramped conditions, etc. But sometimes it's necessary so make sure you're in good healh to begin with.

Expand full comment

Exactly, radiation, recycled and compressed air, not also to mention the awful perfumes and pesticides, that they spray in airplanes: It is the same thing again, as always, we don't really need the germ theory at all to explain, why people get sick in those conditions. And they absolutely do spray airplane cabins with pesticides, by the way. I know, because I have traveled in India with layovers, were we did not have to leave the airplane and they sprayed the airplane, while we were even onboard, and they told us, that they always do, not to spread unwanted bugs, as for instance toxic spiders from one location to another

Expand full comment

Yeah, and people in Ireland should be walking to Poland. It's not that far. Matt Hengst just walked five- or six-thousand kilometers from Delaware to Utah (Mormon territory) and the biggest problem was having to explain to people that Delaware is a real place. Lol. Alright J.P., we gotta get our butts in gear. My plan is if I lose twenty pounds by August I'll start walking from Niagara Falls and see how far I get. That was funny that Finn-ish guy being mystified by getting sick on an airplane. My simple hope for world peace is that everyone who flies gets sick. Certain exclusions apply, like if you're visiting your old mother in Tennessee.

Expand full comment

I agree. But I may have to compromise for the sake of my companion.

So next time it could be a train journey across Europe. Not Ideal but better than a plane.

I haven't abandoned the idea of a long walk though.

Expand full comment

Agree, flights are awful, specially the way that people are treated like cattle and discriminated but that's another matter.

Helen's theory makes a lot of sense.

Expand full comment

It's not only that the air is processed and dry and who-knows-what, air pressure changes, etc... Those things could probably cause respiratory effects on their own.

But another (apparently not well known?) dirty secret about air travel is that modern jet airliners are designed to bleed off air from the engines into the cabin. You can look up the 'why' of this, but needless to say this air is toxic with various burned petroleum fuel and lubricant fumes and residue....

I mean, it would be more surprising to me if you DON'T feel bad after an airline flight...

Expand full comment
Oct 29·edited Oct 29

This can easily be explained by German New Medicine (GNM), where most symptoms are the result of resolving a biological conflict in the psyche. GNM was established in the 1980s and 90s, but has been suppressed due its brilliance as it would pull the rug from under western medicine if it was more widely know. The man who researched and developed this medicine was called Dr. Hamer. He was a western medical doctor who started to suspect that western medicine was off after a tragedy where he lost his teenage son and developed symptoms that didn’t make sense to him.

The short version of GNM is that for every standard anatomical wiring from brain to organ there is a biological conflict in the psyche. This creates a threefold axis of psyche-brain-organ. A disease starts in the psyche with a cold and mostly symptom less phase or conflict active psyche. When the conflict is resolved, a hot phase with symptoms starts and microbes are carefully guided by the brain to either degrade or build up tissue.

Changing location with a short flight, can easily become a resolution to a conflict. The conflict for runny nose is called: "stink conflict", so leaving a figuratively or literally stinky situation, resolves the conflict.

For more information, see: https://gnmonlineseminars.com.

For Dr. Hamer's story, see: https://en.germanische-heilkunde-dr-hamer.com/entdecker/dr-hamer.

Expand full comment

Thank you. I was thinking about this as well. The "Loss of territory" conflict on such a large scale is bound to produce symptoms.

Expand full comment

Yes, it has to do with the heart relay from the brain and could definitively play part in the situations described in the video above. There are many interesting conflicts that could have played their part, because western medicine has such an upside-down view on disease.

Expand full comment

To be clear, I do not know but this may be a reason:

-----

"Many people assume they get sick after a flight due to viruses or bacteria picked up from fellow passengers, but there’s another factor that often goes unnoticed—pesticides sprayed inside aircraft cabins. This procedure, known as "disinsection," is an international practice that involves applying insecticides either before or during a flight to protect public health by controlling insects that spread diseases. Unfortunately, these chemicals can have adverse effects on human health, and their residues can linger long after they’ve been sprayed."

---

https://mestuff.substack.com/p/the-happiest-place-on-earth

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AHfSLhtdXU&t=2s

Expand full comment

The spraying of ''insecticides'' on passengers is another example where the so called authorities violate our bodies considering no consent was ever provided.

Expand full comment

Flight attendants are warned to shut the window shades to minimize radiation exposure at altitude. Not sure if this has any validity but it's what a flight attendant said.

Expand full comment

Flight attendants are not known for their logic.

Expand full comment

massive radiation doses, emf/emr exposure , breathing foul air through circulation system, disconnection with earth frequencies., Bio rhythm disruption, uncomfortable sitting position Chi flow disruption, circulation blockages, terrible food and dead water or soft drinks. Q. how do you know they were in "good health" first as well ? Just not showing the symptoms does not mean good health. I see people tested frequently before I do my Cymatic sonic treatment protocol, who think they are healthy and not showing specific symptoms with terrible low scores on EAV Electro dermal acupuncture testing.

Expand full comment

Thanks I'm aware X ray's can do a lot of harm so I'm furious that prior to boarding we continue to be exposed horrid devices [standing in a perspex cage at an airport for what appears to be far too long when a simple metal detector would suffice and be less alarming.

In good health as opposed to the terrible condition of that person after the flight

I had no idea my off topic question would provoke so many responses perhaps there's something in these that takes us back to the topic of this article.

What killed native populations?

Worsening living conditions imposed on the native populations by the colonialist, slavers etc.

Expand full comment

The one idea we NEVER hear is the converse of "novel germs killed the indigenous of (name your place)": that "novel germs" killed the settlers-- even though at least in the 16th thru 18th centuries, European settlers died in droves in their colonies. In the USA "history," we're told that the settlers died of starvation (because of not knowing how to find/grow food in their new environment), the hazards of the voyage from their origin, retaliation by the people they dispossessed and masachered, etc. Those are actual causes of disease and death. If it were "novel germs," the novelty would have been in both directions, and those "novel germs" would have killed settlers as well as natives.

Invariably the description of the natives of wherever, by the earliest encounters, was that the natives were in robust health, while the Europeans of those days were sickly from living in close quarters in cities where sewage ran in the streets. So the idea that the natives succumbed to "novel germs" while the settlers did not is absurd.

Expand full comment