The "infected blankets" and similar narratives are deeply woven into the false histories which are fed a propagandized global population, be it books, movies,.... They also play a key role in what purport to be critical narratives. And they are even a key part of science fiction, the the common cold killing off t…
The "infected blankets" and similar narratives are deeply woven into the false histories which are fed a propagandized global population, be it books, movies,.... They also play a key role in what purport to be critical narratives. And they are even a key part of science fiction, the the common cold killing off the Martian invaders in War of the Worlds. Saying this is hard to root out is an understatement.
And attacks upon those who try from the perspective of "you're in denial of racism" serve as a conformism reinforcement tool, amazingly just like those who attacked criticism of the official 9/11 narrative regarding what happened to the WTC towers by claiming that "you are denying the ability of nonwhite people to carry out sophisticated military operations," when in fact the critics' point was that no one could knock down the towers using planes.
So many layers of deception to counteract. Thanks for doing way more than your share!
No one ever claimed a plane hit WTC7, not even the official story. Planes hit WTC1 and 2, but most likely not airliners, and that;s not why the towers fell. An airliner did not hit the Pentagon, and the damage to the building and the deaths/injuries were in areas away from where the flying object impacted, indicating explosions were the reason. DEW notion fails some basic evidence tests. especially the fact that the antenna on top of WTC1 started moving downward before the top section (above the impact zone) did so. This required the destruction of the truss hat which supported the antenna, but it happened without any external damage showing. A DEW could not do that. See around 57:00 of this video.
Im aware no one claimed any planes hit no 7 but they did claim planes hit twin towers , and Pent. dont think so and I ALSO SAID CONTROLLED DEMOLITION charges inside which does explain the antenna the Hutchinson effect does explain the pulverization evident I think we are seeing multiple ways.
Judy Wood, whom i used to talk to almost daily from June 2006 to January 2008, posed the Hutchinson Effect to me back then. It is BS. Her thesis of DEW failed numerous tests, including the massive presence of structural steel at the WTC site, evidence she dismissed as "fake."
Great job, Dr Sam Bailey.
The "infected blankets" and similar narratives are deeply woven into the false histories which are fed a propagandized global population, be it books, movies,.... They also play a key role in what purport to be critical narratives. And they are even a key part of science fiction, the the common cold killing off the Martian invaders in War of the Worlds. Saying this is hard to root out is an understatement.
And attacks upon those who try from the perspective of "you're in denial of racism" serve as a conformism reinforcement tool, amazingly just like those who attacked criticism of the official 9/11 narrative regarding what happened to the WTC towers by claiming that "you are denying the ability of nonwhite people to carry out sophisticated military operations," when in fact the critics' point was that no one could knock down the towers using planes.
So many layers of deception to counteract. Thanks for doing way more than your share!
Planes were not used to knock down those towers, placed controlled demolition, DEW s were no planes ever hit them or building 7 or Pentagon
No one ever claimed a plane hit WTC7, not even the official story. Planes hit WTC1 and 2, but most likely not airliners, and that;s not why the towers fell. An airliner did not hit the Pentagon, and the damage to the building and the deaths/injuries were in areas away from where the flying object impacted, indicating explosions were the reason. DEW notion fails some basic evidence tests. especially the fact that the antenna on top of WTC1 started moving downward before the top section (above the impact zone) did so. This required the destruction of the truss hat which supported the antenna, but it happened without any external damage showing. A DEW could not do that. See around 57:00 of this video.
https://richardgage911.substack.com/p/the-smoking-gun-of-irrefutable-evidence
Im aware no one claimed any planes hit no 7 but they did claim planes hit twin towers , and Pent. dont think so and I ALSO SAID CONTROLLED DEMOLITION charges inside which does explain the antenna the Hutchinson effect does explain the pulverization evident I think we are seeing multiple ways.
Judy Wood, whom i used to talk to almost daily from June 2006 to January 2008, posed the Hutchinson Effect to me back then. It is BS. Her thesis of DEW failed numerous tests, including the massive presence of structural steel at the WTC site, evidence she dismissed as "fake."