Randomised controlled trials (1996), i.e. scientific method, have shown ivermectin is less effective than placebo against parasites (I don't mean Nobel laureates or Merck). The IVM shills will need a burqa to cover up their idiocy (or skin depigmentation).
Like every other virology paper, This "compliance" study also insists ivermectin is effective while its own finding says the opposite. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (UK) has been corrupted at least since 1990s.
RCTs have been rendered useless by the capture of the health industry especially during the covid and AIDS psy-ops. Anyone using them as proof of a point has missed this rather obvious fact
How would you know it is the "target drug" vs the overall dietary/lifestyle changes that didn't make the change? There's too many variables to consider. Which is the point. To confuse people back into the false narrative. The control group that simply fasts for several days or is given a more restrictive diet without any drugs who would also recover would invalidate the drug (why would you need it if there are other ways to recover?) Of course those studies would be buried or removed from the design of the pharma-backed study in the first place.
Hi Jon. Is this question for me? I pay scant attention to pharmaceutical studies as a) they are unreliable and often badly-designed and b) in my health paradigm no one needs chemical drugs to recover from anything. From scanning this comment thread it seems like many people haven't actually followed the work of the Drs. Bailey and perhaps it's time to do that. In addition, Dr Denis Rancourt's work on looking at "all cause mortality" worldwide showed zero evidence of a pathogen spread, ie there wasn't a pandemic at all. No one "caught" anything. The planners are smarter than the general public and they have known for decades that "respiratory" illness is the body cleaning itself out and happens regularly often induced by a season change from warm to colder weather, after the winter holiday season. Notice they didn't "start" their pandemic in the Summer. When people finally learn how the body works that will be when no one can convince them to take a vaccine much less a worm-killing poison to kick bronchitis. Modern Medicine is a deadly and false paradigm and it regularly kills people . . . "death by doctor" is the third leading cause of death in the US after heart disease and cancer.
Begs the question: what is cancer? From the natural health paradigm cancer is the body's attempt to cure itself. This is why "killing" the cancer often fails over time. Or more specifically, poisoning the body to get rid of the cancer is counter-intuitive. And there are many instances of false positives in the "cancer" world these days. So there's that.
Pierre Kory is a guest on VSRF this evening. I wonder if he’s seen this. They’ve had hugely successful ivermectin protocols, though combined with other drugs. Paul Marik also mentioned its use against cancer.
Can we get to the bottom of this? I admire these guys very much, and saw what they went through since 2020.
There is a lot of black and white here. IVM can't work, IVM works. While strongly defending the viral hoax, you only briefly touched on the parasite issue. IVM began as an anti-parasitic and if you talk to any veterinarian, it is effective with parasites. Dogs and horse don't buy into the placebo effect. Maybe there is more here related to parasites and general health, in humans as well as animals, that should be examined before passing judgement. It is hard to argue with results and although they may not meet the double blind standards, there are many solid testimonies of the effectiveness of IVM for both parasites and cancer. Before everyone thinks they know everything lets' ask why.
Another Q is, what about the consistency of the manufacture of the IVM concoction? Didn't the original "stufff" have elements of this Japanese earth in it...perhaps containing fungal stuff or whatever ...& the pharma stuff might not be the same?? I suspect the India observations using IVM need to be investigated.
Love your work Drs' Sam and Mark Bailey! Looking past their virus stance, I find it incredible that these doctors continue to push the pandemic narrative after Rancourt et al have shown conclusively that a pandemic did not in occur. If a pandemic did not occur, what exactly do they think they are treating?
Exactly. That’s the question that needs answering instead of all this bullshit , I’m right so your wrong, infighting bullshit. Sadly both the video and the comments have been a huge disappointment for someone looking for truth instead of agenda.
The no virus base is probably right but to expect the rest of the world to just jump into lockstep despite the years of education/ indoctrination is an arrogance befitting those we battle
So the jab is essentially a witch brew as is the concoction where they find these viruses- a cow , a monkey kidney, nose hair from an elf and unicorn horn powder . Let’s play their medieval game and start a global witch-hunt .
When do we get to enlightenment . Medieval times look more and more like a renaissance
I searched ivermectin+cancer when I learned it could treat COVID. It returned many studies that suggested that ivermectin could be effective against cancer. I rationalized that Dr. Fauci did not want ivermectin getting out as if it was being widely used for COVID treatment and prevention, peoples cancers may also be treated.
Dr. Lee Merritt has found that cancer is actually parasites. No wonder antiparasitics could be effective for treating cancer.
I leaned of this in April 2020, long before anyone was talking about it. I mentioned to Dell Bigtree at The Red Pill Expo, Jekyll Island, that ivermectin could be effective against cancer. He said he had heard that, but did not talk about it in his presentation. I have been using it prophylactically ever since.
Three opposable thumbs up Team Sam - but spare a thought for that poor monkey whos kidney cells must be all but depleted by now. Thanks for your ongoing efforts to inform those willing to consider an approach outside mainstream allopathy -and Bush's weapons of mass deception
Your post raises important points, Dr. Bailey, but I believe it could benefit from additional context. The debate around the use of Ivermectin and HCQ during the pandemic was intense, with critics often describing Ivermectin as merely a horse dewormer and discouraging its use in COVID-19 treatment, while simultaneously promoting what many of us already knew about the danger of taking experimental vaccines.
Furthermore, the effectiveness of a drug doesn't necessarily depend on the existence of a specific virus. People were undoubtedly falling ill, and the question of whether Ivermectin was effective in alleviating symptoms of the illness remains open. I had hoped this video segment would delve into the studies and perhaps reveal some of their shortcomings, but it did not touch on this. As a result, I'm left with unresolved questions and remain unconvinced.
Thank you for your article. You made the key point I think: Viruses don’t need to exist in order for us to believe certain treatments can be effective and even safe in treating symptoms of disease. And sometimes it’s the symptoms that kill us.
I don’t believe Antibiotics are a cure for the cause of disease either, but sometimes they are necessary when the actual symptoms need to be addressed.
I suppose you might be thinking of acute pain for example? If we can sleep then the body might have a chance to recuperate. One hears of people put into a coma so they can recover.
I recall a story by James Herriot who was a veterinarian in the UK. He tells a story when he injected what appeared to be a dying sheep with a supposedly lethal dose of barbituate or similar.
In fact the sheep just went into a coma for 48 hours and then was right as rain. Apparently James did the same with a little dog, but aware of the level of drug to put it into a deep sleep. Again it recovered.
Of course one cannot know the body chemistry of the creatures but it was noteworthy to me.
Re antibiotics we talk as if they are always big pharmas which are typically over refined. My dad talked of pure, white and deady in respect of refined sugar, but it applies to pharmaceuticals particularly.
It is not that they can't work but more that they are too strong. By the time they are diluted back down to reasonable levels they are lile the natural products they messed around with in the first place!
Thankyou for confirming exact suspicions… same line of thought, practice same healthy living… & don’t prescribe to fake tests, we then live on as normal, end of story.
Really enjoying the articles on bogus illnesses & diseases. Thankyou for all the info.
It is a Trillion $ business...like the MIC...they all lie, cheat, steal....to get their snouts in the HUGE trough of public money....& they bribe, sorry donate to, politicians...Gates paid 100's $ millions to media barons to silence covid critics as "misinformation speakers" & "granny killers" et al "Vaccination diners" ...ANTI-Vaxers ...it's surreal
Interesting Sam,...however apart from the "know science" it seems because there were so many ostensibly credible doctors clearly saying Ivermectin cured paitients in about 24 & 48 hrs it likely does work (for these types of disease, flue, pneumonia or whatever they are called). Same goes for the Cancer cure claims. AFAIK Ivermectin affects the biome & the biome does a lot "stuff" re the bodys functions. Dr Tess Lawrie who seems v credible to me was/is promoting IV very staunchly. The simple question is does it work...& unlike "the death shot" seems it does.
Maybe the body knows how to heal and once fear is replaced by trust, healing happens DESPITE the drug. Have there been studies where placebo was given and patient told it was ivermectin?
Yes but that doesn't mean to can't fix this "covid/flue" disease....perhaps this disease is coming from the biome or parasites. Too many experts claiming it works wonders & not just on "covid"/flue
I recently commented at Meryl Nass's substack trying to get her to discuss the virus/no virus issue in a sitdown online venue (I offer your name as an example simply because you are both women). She says that you are not serious and have never reached out to her to have such a discussion. I explained that I would share the series of statements and hope that you will hopefully arrange to have this discussion.
I feel that everything that you and Mark have explained are straightforward, rational and goes straight to the issue, whereas I see obfuscation and the run-around elsewhere.
My sincere hope is that Meryl Nass will be straightforward, rational and go straight to the issue, as I know that you would.
I would trust Meryl ahead of the Baileys. The harm the Baileys, Kaufman, Young etc have done with their dangerous nonsense they have created to divert attention from out what is the truth, is IMHO a calamity against humankind!
Meryl is actively using bad information and links to bolster her comments to me. Sam Bailey has not done so. The only person who is actively being untruthful is Meryl.
It is all very simple. Why did the germ theory survive after Pasteur's admission that the microbe is nothing the terrain is everything, thereby de facto adopting the view of his scientific rival Antoine Béchamp? I think the answer lies in the simple psychological fact that it is more attractive to have an outside enemy you can fight, than it is to take responsibility for your health. It is this psychological fact which has enabled the development of the whole allopathic model of medicine, and "a pill for every ill," which has made America in particular a pill-popping culture. Information such as Dr. Nandita Shah's drug-free covid protocol (https://youtu.be/zfJMz_LnarY?si=3Fv4ng-E-hX-l5Xn), as much as the insights from the Baileys were squashed. There is too much money in the treatment model. Being healthy is not profitable for medicine. It's the psychotic need for outside enemies which enables the snakeoil salesmen of big pharma to clean up, and medicine has become a massive wealth transfer mechanism, which was exploited to the hilt in the covid panic of 2020 and beyond.
Dr Sam, I have no idea how Ivermectin works and what it fights against. One thing I am absolutely sure: whenever I am feeling sick, the first drug that come to my mind is Ivermectin. I used to take 24mg of IVM every week. From March 24 on I am talking 12mg DAILY and I am feeling great. I don't believe it is a placebo effect.
But I am not a scientist. My intention was to bring my personal experience. I am not recommending anything to anyone. I am 64 and I have never heard about Ivermectin until 2020. The first time I took it I was really impressed how I recovered from a very sick afternoon in just 6 hours. Since that day I introduced IVM in my life and I have nothing to complain or regret. This is a medicine that you can say it is SAFE.
Including members of my own family
With stage 4 aggressive cancers post jab…
I’m pleased to report that ivermectin with a few binders has worked miracles.
99% of tumours gone after 18 months trial
Over 60 people now we have whiteness’d positive results from using treatments like fenbendazole and ivermectin.
A REAL SAFE AND EFFECTIVE TREATMENT.🙏
I’d consider un censored platforms using search engines like brave
Pier reviewed studies
Question everything not just limited to one dr
Research, research, research.
Take your health in to your own hands.
Heal yourself
I personally am a realist
I’m still taking IVERMECTIN, 3 days on 7 days off now .
For the last 4 years .
Cancer free
Along with over 100 other people
All doing fantastic
Peter Mc culloughs spike support for a year , still got a very slight D dimmer but it’s getting better.post SARS 2 April 2020.
Started 7 mg nicotine patches 3 days ago
Figured no harm in trying a…
Throbbing elbows and fingers have gone .
And waking up to morning glory has returned.
Something that was a distant memory.🙏🏻
My aneurysm thoracic aorta 🫀 post sars 2 has now reduced to its normal size
I’ve been taking dr Judy mikovitz recommendations CARDIO MIRACLE, along with a healthy diet and as she says a tea spoon of DMG .
Live long an prosper 🙏🏻
Randomised controlled trials (1996), i.e. scientific method, have shown ivermectin is less effective than placebo against parasites (I don't mean Nobel laureates or Merck). The IVM shills will need a burqa to cover up their idiocy (or skin depigmentation).
Like every other virology paper, This "compliance" study also insists ivermectin is effective while its own finding says the opposite. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (UK) has been corrupted at least since 1990s.
Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10160375
RCTs have been rendered useless by the capture of the health industry especially during the covid and AIDS psy-ops. Anyone using them as proof of a point has missed this rather obvious fact
Eventually worse, Cfr
The Deadly Toll of Ivermectin: Blindness, Comas & Deaths Induced by The Neurotoxic, Genotoxic Poison (substack.com)
Ivermectin, WHO, UN, Merck, The World Bank & Kissinger's World Population Plan of Action (substack.com)
(16) "CLASTOGENIC" - 18 Studies Highlighting Ivermectin Induced DNA Breakage and Damage (substack.com)
Chloroquine Devastates Male Rat Fertility: 4 Rat Studies Show Massively Deleterious Effects (substack.com)
The Ivermectin Double Cross - by Etienne de la Boetie2 (substack.com)
Is ivermectin really a genocidal tool of the globalists? (substack.com)
Excellent!! read a book called Rick Simpson Oil; "Nature's Answer to Cancer"
If they are cancer free after 10 years, then you can declare it an effective treatment.
I have worked with a number of patients who had the same initial result using chemotherapy and they are all dead now.
How would you know it is the "target drug" vs the overall dietary/lifestyle changes that didn't make the change? There's too many variables to consider. Which is the point. To confuse people back into the false narrative. The control group that simply fasts for several days or is given a more restrictive diet without any drugs who would also recover would invalidate the drug (why would you need it if there are other ways to recover?) Of course those studies would be buried or removed from the design of the pharma-backed study in the first place.
Hi Jon. Is this question for me? I pay scant attention to pharmaceutical studies as a) they are unreliable and often badly-designed and b) in my health paradigm no one needs chemical drugs to recover from anything. From scanning this comment thread it seems like many people haven't actually followed the work of the Drs. Bailey and perhaps it's time to do that. In addition, Dr Denis Rancourt's work on looking at "all cause mortality" worldwide showed zero evidence of a pathogen spread, ie there wasn't a pandemic at all. No one "caught" anything. The planners are smarter than the general public and they have known for decades that "respiratory" illness is the body cleaning itself out and happens regularly often induced by a season change from warm to colder weather, after the winter holiday season. Notice they didn't "start" their pandemic in the Summer. When people finally learn how the body works that will be when no one can convince them to take a vaccine much less a worm-killing poison to kick bronchitis. Modern Medicine is a deadly and false paradigm and it regularly kills people . . . "death by doctor" is the third leading cause of death in the US after heart disease and cancer.
Begs the question: what is cancer? From the natural health paradigm cancer is the body's attempt to cure itself. This is why "killing" the cancer often fails over time. Or more specifically, poisoning the body to get rid of the cancer is counter-intuitive. And there are many instances of false positives in the "cancer" world these days. So there's that.
Pierre Kory is a guest on VSRF this evening. I wonder if he’s seen this. They’ve had hugely successful ivermectin protocols, though combined with other drugs. Paul Marik also mentioned its use against cancer.
Can we get to the bottom of this? I admire these guys very much, and saw what they went through since 2020.
More realistic solutions, IME:
THE CANCER RACKET (whale.to)
Or: http://www.whale.to/cancer.html#Therapies_under_types_or_protocols_
Cancer being generally a pH/ Oxygenation problem:
Dr. Tullio Simincini (whale.to)
ALSO, targeted articles from
Scientific Posts | Dr. Robert Young (drrobertyoung.com)
More like IverMercktin.
Well, if ivermectin works on sheep it might work on sheeple.
Baaaaa....
If Ivermectin was able to get rid of the Parasites who are infesting Washington DC, we'd all be healthier..........
Maybe we can load up one of those cloud seeding planes with IVM
and do a flyover.
There is a lot of black and white here. IVM can't work, IVM works. While strongly defending the viral hoax, you only briefly touched on the parasite issue. IVM began as an anti-parasitic and if you talk to any veterinarian, it is effective with parasites. Dogs and horse don't buy into the placebo effect. Maybe there is more here related to parasites and general health, in humans as well as animals, that should be examined before passing judgement. It is hard to argue with results and although they may not meet the double blind standards, there are many solid testimonies of the effectiveness of IVM for both parasites and cancer. Before everyone thinks they know everything lets' ask why.
Another Q is, what about the consistency of the manufacture of the IVM concoction? Didn't the original "stufff" have elements of this Japanese earth in it...perhaps containing fungal stuff or whatever ...& the pharma stuff might not be the same?? I suspect the India observations using IVM need to be investigated.
Indeed, as is true of all manufactured things, not all IVM is 'born' equal! Same problem I believe with monosodium glutomate.
Spot on Tom
Egyptians recognize that “Tumors” are actually parasite sacks.
Love your work Drs' Sam and Mark Bailey! Looking past their virus stance, I find it incredible that these doctors continue to push the pandemic narrative after Rancourt et al have shown conclusively that a pandemic did not in occur. If a pandemic did not occur, what exactly do they think they are treating?
Their egos and bank balances.
Exactly. That’s the question that needs answering instead of all this bullshit , I’m right so your wrong, infighting bullshit. Sadly both the video and the comments have been a huge disappointment for someone looking for truth instead of agenda.
The no virus base is probably right but to expect the rest of the world to just jump into lockstep despite the years of education/ indoctrination is an arrogance befitting those we battle
What do we call a ”truth” that is heavily protected from criticism by censorship and also heavily propagated and promoted by algorithms ?
If you answered PROPAGANDA you have won a years supply of red pills .
So the jab is essentially a witch brew as is the concoction where they find these viruses- a cow , a monkey kidney, nose hair from an elf and unicorn horn powder . Let’s play their medieval game and start a global witch-hunt .
When do we get to enlightenment . Medieval times look more and more like a renaissance
I call the jab "satans syrup"!!
Shakespeare had it right.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/03/11/macbeth-the-three-witches-scene/
I searched ivermectin+cancer when I learned it could treat COVID. It returned many studies that suggested that ivermectin could be effective against cancer. I rationalized that Dr. Fauci did not want ivermectin getting out as if it was being widely used for COVID treatment and prevention, peoples cancers may also be treated.
Dr. Lee Merritt has found that cancer is actually parasites. No wonder antiparasitics could be effective for treating cancer.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/X4PFBah1VdSX/
Did you comment without watching bro?
I leaned of this in April 2020, long before anyone was talking about it. I mentioned to Dell Bigtree at The Red Pill Expo, Jekyll Island, that ivermectin could be effective against cancer. He said he had heard that, but did not talk about it in his presentation. I have been using it prophylactically ever since.
Very disappointed in bigtree...he refuses to acknowledge the work of the Baileys.
Sorry, I don't believe in any drugs. Search Germanic Healing Knowledge and the 5 biological laws.
All pharmaceuticals have an LD50 measure.
What is LD50?
LD50 is lethal dose in 50% of subjects. It is a measure of toxicity.
I never knew this. Actually never heard it mentioned before. Thanks.
You have a lot of waking up to do...🫣
Three opposable thumbs up Team Sam - but spare a thought for that poor monkey whos kidney cells must be all but depleted by now. Thanks for your ongoing efforts to inform those willing to consider an approach outside mainstream allopathy -and Bush's weapons of mass deception
yeah I was thinking about the poor monkey
Yep - it's what is known as collateral damage - means to an end - no wonder we blunder
Your post raises important points, Dr. Bailey, but I believe it could benefit from additional context. The debate around the use of Ivermectin and HCQ during the pandemic was intense, with critics often describing Ivermectin as merely a horse dewormer and discouraging its use in COVID-19 treatment, while simultaneously promoting what many of us already knew about the danger of taking experimental vaccines.
Furthermore, the effectiveness of a drug doesn't necessarily depend on the existence of a specific virus. People were undoubtedly falling ill, and the question of whether Ivermectin was effective in alleviating symptoms of the illness remains open. I had hoped this video segment would delve into the studies and perhaps reveal some of their shortcomings, but it did not touch on this. As a result, I'm left with unresolved questions and remain unconvinced.
Me too
I don't believe in viruses as cause of disease. I wrote this on ivermectin.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/05/24/ivermectin-hydroxychloroquine-and-covid-19/
Thank you for your article. You made the key point I think: Viruses don’t need to exist in order for us to believe certain treatments can be effective and even safe in treating symptoms of disease. And sometimes it’s the symptoms that kill us.
I don’t believe Antibiotics are a cure for the cause of disease either, but sometimes they are necessary when the actual symptoms need to be addressed.
I suppose you might be thinking of acute pain for example? If we can sleep then the body might have a chance to recuperate. One hears of people put into a coma so they can recover.
I recall a story by James Herriot who was a veterinarian in the UK. He tells a story when he injected what appeared to be a dying sheep with a supposedly lethal dose of barbituate or similar.
In fact the sheep just went into a coma for 48 hours and then was right as rain. Apparently James did the same with a little dog, but aware of the level of drug to put it into a deep sleep. Again it recovered.
Of course one cannot know the body chemistry of the creatures but it was noteworthy to me.
Re antibiotics we talk as if they are always big pharmas which are typically over refined. My dad talked of pure, white and deady in respect of refined sugar, but it applies to pharmaceuticals particularly.
It is not that they can't work but more that they are too strong. By the time they are diluted back down to reasonable levels they are lile the natural products they messed around with in the first place!
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/the-big-pharma-health-business-model
In any event though, God created antibiotics in the first place in mild forms as part of the balance of life.
If of interest I did this the other day.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/amoxicillin-and-a-hospital-visit
Thankyou for confirming exact suspicions… same line of thought, practice same healthy living… & don’t prescribe to fake tests, we then live on as normal, end of story.
Really enjoying the articles on bogus illnesses & diseases. Thankyou for all the info.
It's such a shame that we have to live in a world that bombards us with endless lies and psychological operations. It's disgusting.
It is a Trillion $ business...like the MIC...they all lie, cheat, steal....to get their snouts in the HUGE trough of public money....& they bribe, sorry donate to, politicians...Gates paid 100's $ millions to media barons to silence covid critics as "misinformation speakers" & "granny killers" et al "Vaccination diners" ...ANTI-Vaxers ...it's surreal
Interesting Sam,...however apart from the "know science" it seems because there were so many ostensibly credible doctors clearly saying Ivermectin cured paitients in about 24 & 48 hrs it likely does work (for these types of disease, flue, pneumonia or whatever they are called). Same goes for the Cancer cure claims. AFAIK Ivermectin affects the biome & the biome does a lot "stuff" re the bodys functions. Dr Tess Lawrie who seems v credible to me was/is promoting IV very staunchly. The simple question is does it work...& unlike "the death shot" seems it does.
Maybe the body knows how to heal and once fear is replaced by trust, healing happens DESPITE the drug. Have there been studies where placebo was given and patient told it was ivermectin?
Yes... placebo effect is very powerful
Ivermectin cannot sure a virus or disease that does not exist.
Yes but that doesn't mean to can't fix this "covid/flue" disease....perhaps this disease is coming from the biome or parasites. Too many experts claiming it works wonders & not just on "covid"/flue
I saw a lady at the beach with a suit so skimpy it just barely made legal. I was like, "that's an alleged cover-up."
Sounds like a scam-kini to me?
Hello Dr Sam,
I recently commented at Meryl Nass's substack trying to get her to discuss the virus/no virus issue in a sitdown online venue (I offer your name as an example simply because you are both women). She says that you are not serious and have never reached out to her to have such a discussion. I explained that I would share the series of statements and hope that you will hopefully arrange to have this discussion.
I feel that everything that you and Mark have explained are straightforward, rational and goes straight to the issue, whereas I see obfuscation and the run-around elsewhere.
My sincere hope is that Meryl Nass will be straightforward, rational and go straight to the issue, as I know that you would.
Thank you,
AP
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/if-the-good-guys-cant-resolve-their/comment/55254588
I would trust Meryl ahead of the Baileys. The harm the Baileys, Kaufman, Young etc have done with their dangerous nonsense they have created to divert attention from out what is the truth, is IMHO a calamity against humankind!
Meryl is actively using bad information and links to bolster her comments to me. Sam Bailey has not done so. The only person who is actively being untruthful is Meryl.
It is all very simple. Why did the germ theory survive after Pasteur's admission that the microbe is nothing the terrain is everything, thereby de facto adopting the view of his scientific rival Antoine Béchamp? I think the answer lies in the simple psychological fact that it is more attractive to have an outside enemy you can fight, than it is to take responsibility for your health. It is this psychological fact which has enabled the development of the whole allopathic model of medicine, and "a pill for every ill," which has made America in particular a pill-popping culture. Information such as Dr. Nandita Shah's drug-free covid protocol (https://youtu.be/zfJMz_LnarY?si=3Fv4ng-E-hX-l5Xn), as much as the insights from the Baileys were squashed. There is too much money in the treatment model. Being healthy is not profitable for medicine. It's the psychotic need for outside enemies which enables the snakeoil salesmen of big pharma to clean up, and medicine has become a massive wealth transfer mechanism, which was exploited to the hilt in the covid panic of 2020 and beyond.
Dr Sam, I have no idea how Ivermectin works and what it fights against. One thing I am absolutely sure: whenever I am feeling sick, the first drug that come to my mind is Ivermectin. I used to take 24mg of IVM every week. From March 24 on I am talking 12mg DAILY and I am feeling great. I don't believe it is a placebo effect.
"Belief" is not science.
But I am not a scientist. My intention was to bring my personal experience. I am not recommending anything to anyone. I am 64 and I have never heard about Ivermectin until 2020. The first time I took it I was really impressed how I recovered from a very sick afternoon in just 6 hours. Since that day I introduced IVM in my life and I have nothing to complain or regret. This is a medicine that you can say it is SAFE.
Too many saying same for it not to carry some weight....ought be credibly tested if funding for that is even possible
I’ve had enough “Science” to last a lifetime! “Trust the Science”. NOT!
True but observation is.
You could get the same result without using a toxic drug such as vitamin C for example.