222 Comments

Including members of my own family

With stage 4 aggressive cancers post jab…

I’m pleased to report that ivermectin with a few binders has worked miracles.

99% of tumours gone after 18 months trial

Over 60 people now we have whiteness’d positive results from using treatments like fenbendazole and ivermectin.

A REAL SAFE AND EFFECTIVE TREATMENT.🙏

Expand full comment

Randomised controlled trials (1996), i.e. scientific method, have shown ivermectin is less effective than placebo against parasites (I don't mean Nobel laureates or Merck). The IVM shills will need a burqa to cover up their idiocy (or skin depigmentation).

Like every other virology paper, This "compliance" study also insists ivermectin is effective while its own finding says the opposite. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (UK) has been corrupted at least since 1990s.

Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10160375

Expand full comment

RCTs have been rendered useless by the capture of the health industry especially during the covid and AIDS psy-ops. Anyone using them as proof of a point has missed this rather obvious fact

Expand full comment

Eventually worse, Cfr

The Deadly Toll of Ivermectin: Blindness, Comas & Deaths Induced by The Neurotoxic, Genotoxic Poison (substack.com)

Ivermectin, WHO, UN, Merck, The World Bank & Kissinger's World Population Plan of Action (substack.com)

(16) "CLASTOGENIC" - 18 Studies Highlighting Ivermectin Induced DNA Breakage and Damage (substack.com)

Chloroquine Devastates Male Rat Fertility: 4 Rat Studies Show Massively Deleterious Effects (substack.com)

The Ivermectin Double Cross - by Etienne de la Boetie2 (substack.com)

Is ivermectin really a genocidal tool of the globalists? (substack.com)

Expand full comment

Excellent!! read a book called Rick Simpson Oil; "Nature's Answer to Cancer"

Expand full comment

If they are cancer free after 10 years, then you can declare it an effective treatment.

Expand full comment

I have worked with a number of patients who had the same initial result using chemotherapy and they are all dead now.

Expand full comment

How would you know it is the "target drug" vs the overall dietary/lifestyle changes that didn't make the change? There's too many variables to consider. Which is the point. To confuse people back into the false narrative. The control group that simply fasts for several days or is given a more restrictive diet without any drugs who would also recover would invalidate the drug (why would you need it if there are other ways to recover?) Of course those studies would be buried or removed from the design of the pharma-backed study in the first place.

Expand full comment

Hi Jon. Is this question for me? I pay scant attention to pharmaceutical studies as a) they are unreliable and often badly-designed and b) in my health paradigm no one needs chemical drugs to recover from anything. From scanning this comment thread it seems like many people haven't actually followed the work of the Drs. Bailey and perhaps it's time to do that. In addition, Dr Denis Rancourt's work on looking at "all cause mortality" worldwide showed zero evidence of a pathogen spread, ie there wasn't a pandemic at all. No one "caught" anything. The planners are smarter than the general public and they have known for decades that "respiratory" illness is the body cleaning itself out and happens regularly often induced by a season change from warm to colder weather, after the winter holiday season. Notice they didn't "start" their pandemic in the Summer. When people finally learn how the body works that will be when no one can convince them to take a vaccine much less a worm-killing poison to kick bronchitis. Modern Medicine is a deadly and false paradigm and it regularly kills people . . . "death by doctor" is the third leading cause of death in the US after heart disease and cancer.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
May 2
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Begs the question: what is cancer? From the natural health paradigm cancer is the body's attempt to cure itself. This is why "killing" the cancer often fails over time. Or more specifically, poisoning the body to get rid of the cancer is counter-intuitive. And there are many instances of false positives in the "cancer" world these days. So there's that.

Expand full comment

I’d consider un censored platforms using search engines like brave

Pier reviewed studies

Question everything not just limited to one dr

Research, research, research.

Take your health in to your own hands.

Heal yourself

I personally am a realist

I’m still taking IVERMECTIN, 3 days on 7 days off now .

For the last 4 years .

Cancer free

Along with over 100 other people

All doing fantastic

Peter Mc culloughs spike support for a year , still got a very slight D dimmer but it’s getting better.post SARS 2 April 2020.

Started 7 mg nicotine patches 3 days ago

Figured no harm in trying a…

Throbbing elbows and fingers have gone .

And waking up to morning glory has returned.

Something that was a distant memory.🙏🏻

My aneurysm thoracic aorta 🫀 post sars 2 has now reduced to its normal size

I’ve been taking dr Judy mikovitz recommendations CARDIO MIRACLE, along with a healthy diet and as she says a tea spoon of DMG .

Live long an prosper 🙏🏻

Expand full comment

More realistic solutions, IME:

THE CANCER RACKET (whale.to)

Or: http://www.whale.to/cancer.html#Therapies_under_types_or_protocols_

Cancer being generally a pH/ Oxygenation problem:

Dr. Tullio Simincini (whale.to)

ALSO, targeted articles from

Scientific Posts | Dr. Robert Young (drrobertyoung.com)

Expand full comment
Comment removed
May 2
Comment removed
Expand full comment

More like IverMercktin.

Expand full comment

There is a lot of black and white here. IVM can't work, IVM works. While strongly defending the viral hoax, you only briefly touched on the parasite issue. IVM began as an anti-parasitic and if you talk to any veterinarian, it is effective with parasites. Dogs and horse don't buy into the placebo effect. Maybe there is more here related to parasites and general health, in humans as well as animals, that should be examined before passing judgement. It is hard to argue with results and although they may not meet the double blind standards, there are many solid testimonies of the effectiveness of IVM for both parasites and cancer. Before everyone thinks they know everything lets' ask why.

Expand full comment

Another Q is, what about the consistency of the manufacture of the IVM concoction? Didn't the original "stufff" have elements of this Japanese earth in it...perhaps containing fungal stuff or whatever ...& the pharma stuff might not be the same?? I suspect the India observations using IVM need to be investigated.

Expand full comment

Indeed, as is true of all manufactured things, not all IVM is 'born' equal! Same problem I believe with monosodium glutomate.

Expand full comment

Spot on Tom

Expand full comment

Well, if ivermectin works on sheep it might work on sheeple.

Expand full comment

Baaaaa....

Expand full comment

If Ivermectin was able to get rid of the Parasites who are infesting Washington DC, we'd all be healthier..........

Expand full comment

Maybe we can load up one of those cloud seeding planes with IVM

and do a flyover.

Expand full comment

Love your work Drs' Sam and Mark Bailey! Looking past their virus stance, I find it incredible that these doctors continue to push the pandemic narrative after Rancourt et al have shown conclusively that a pandemic did not in occur. If a pandemic did not occur, what exactly do they think they are treating?

Expand full comment

Their egos and bank balances.

Expand full comment

Exactly. That’s the question that needs answering instead of all this bullshit , I’m right so your wrong, infighting bullshit. Sadly both the video and the comments have been a huge disappointment for someone looking for truth instead of agenda.

The no virus base is probably right but to expect the rest of the world to just jump into lockstep despite the years of education/ indoctrination is an arrogance befitting those we battle

Expand full comment

What do we call a ”truth” that is heavily protected from criticism by censorship and also heavily propagated and promoted by algorithms ?

If you answered PROPAGANDA you have won a years supply of red pills .

Expand full comment

So the jab is essentially a witch brew as is the concoction where they find these viruses- a cow , a monkey kidney, nose hair from an elf and unicorn horn powder . Let’s play their medieval game and start a global witch-hunt .

When do we get to enlightenment . Medieval times look more and more like a renaissance

Expand full comment

Three opposable thumbs up Team Sam - but spare a thought for that poor monkey whos kidney cells must be all but depleted by now. Thanks for your ongoing efforts to inform those willing to consider an approach outside mainstream allopathy -and Bush's weapons of mass deception

Expand full comment

yeah I was thinking about the poor monkey

Expand full comment

Yep - it's what is known as collateral damage - means to an end - no wonder we blunder

Expand full comment

I searched ivermectin+cancer when I learned it could treat COVID. It returned many studies that suggested that ivermectin could be effective against cancer. I rationalized that Dr. Fauci did not want ivermectin getting out as if it was being widely used for COVID treatment and prevention, peoples cancers may also be treated.

Dr. Lee Merritt has found that cancer is actually parasites. No wonder antiparasitics could be effective for treating cancer.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/X4PFBah1VdSX/

Expand full comment

Did you comment without watching bro?

Expand full comment

I leaned of this in April 2020, long before anyone was talking about it. I mentioned to Dell Bigtree at The Red Pill Expo, Jekyll Island, that ivermectin could be effective against cancer. He said he had heard that, but did not talk about it in his presentation. I have been using it prophylactically ever since.

Expand full comment

Very disappointed in bigtree...he refuses to acknowledge the work of the Baileys.

Expand full comment

Sorry, I don't believe in any drugs. Search Germanic Healing Knowledge and the 5 biological laws.

Expand full comment

All pharmaceuticals have an LD50 measure.

Expand full comment

What is LD50?

Expand full comment

LD50 is lethal dose in 50% of subjects. It is a measure of toxicity.

Expand full comment

I never knew this. Actually never heard it mentioned before. Thanks.

Expand full comment

You have a lot of waking up to do...🫣

Expand full comment

Thankyou for confirming exact suspicions… same line of thought, practice same healthy living… & don’t prescribe to fake tests, we then live on as normal, end of story.

Really enjoying the articles on bogus illnesses & diseases. Thankyou for all the info.

Expand full comment

Interesting Sam,...however apart from the "know science" it seems because there were so many ostensibly credible doctors clearly saying Ivermectin cured paitients in about 24 & 48 hrs it likely does work (for these types of disease, flue, pneumonia or whatever they are called). Same goes for the Cancer cure claims. AFAIK Ivermectin affects the biome & the biome does a lot "stuff" re the bodys functions. Dr Tess Lawrie who seems v credible to me was/is promoting IV very staunchly. The simple question is does it work...& unlike "the death shot" seems it does.

Expand full comment

Maybe the body knows how to heal and once fear is replaced by trust, healing happens DESPITE the drug. Have there been studies where placebo was given and patient told it was ivermectin?

Expand full comment

Yes... placebo effect is very powerful

Expand full comment

Ivermectin cannot sure a virus or disease that does not exist.

Expand full comment

Your post raises important points, Dr. Bailey, but I believe it could benefit from additional context. The debate around the use of Ivermectin and HCQ during the pandemic was intense, with critics often describing Ivermectin as merely a horse dewormer and discouraging its use in COVID-19 treatment, while simultaneously promoting what many of us already knew about the danger of taking experimental vaccines.

Furthermore, the effectiveness of a drug doesn't necessarily depend on the existence of a specific virus. People were undoubtedly falling ill, and the question of whether Ivermectin was effective in alleviating symptoms of the illness remains open. I had hoped this video segment would delve into the studies and perhaps reveal some of their shortcomings, but it did not touch on this. As a result, I'm left with unresolved questions and remain unconvinced.

Expand full comment

Me too

Expand full comment

I don't believe in viruses as cause of disease. I wrote this on ivermectin.

https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/05/24/ivermectin-hydroxychloroquine-and-covid-19/

Expand full comment
May 10Edited

Thank you for your article. You made the key point I think: Viruses don’t need to exist in order for us to believe certain treatments can be effective and even safe in treating symptoms of disease. And sometimes it’s the symptoms that kill us.

I don’t believe Antibiotics are a cure for the cause of disease either, but sometimes they are necessary when the actual symptoms need to be addressed.

Expand full comment

I suppose you might be thinking of acute pain for example? If we can sleep then the body might have a chance to recuperate. One hears of people put into a coma so they can recover.

I recall a story by James Herriot who was a veterinarian in the UK. He tells a story when he injected what appeared to be a dying sheep with a supposedly lethal dose of barbituate or similar.

In fact the sheep just went into a coma for 48 hours and then was right as rain. Apparently James did the same with a little dog, but aware of the level of drug to put it into a deep sleep. Again it recovered.

Of course one cannot know the body chemistry of the creatures but it was noteworthy to me.

Re antibiotics we talk as if they are always big pharmas which are typically over refined. My dad talked of pure, white and deady in respect of refined sugar, but it applies to pharmaceuticals particularly.

It is not that they can't work but more that they are too strong. By the time they are diluted back down to reasonable levels they are lile the natural products they messed around with in the first place!

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/the-big-pharma-health-business-model

In any event though, God created antibiotics in the first place in mild forms as part of the balance of life.

If of interest I did this the other day.

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/amoxicillin-and-a-hospital-visit

Expand full comment

I saw a lady at the beach with a suit so skimpy it just barely made legal. I was like, "that's an alleged cover-up."

Expand full comment

Sounds like a scam-kini to me?

Expand full comment

Hello Dr Sam,

I recently commented at Meryl Nass's substack trying to get her to discuss the virus/no virus issue in a sitdown online venue (I offer your name as an example simply because you are both women). She says that you are not serious and have never reached out to her to have such a discussion. I explained that I would share the series of statements and hope that you will hopefully arrange to have this discussion.

I feel that everything that you and Mark have explained are straightforward, rational and goes straight to the issue, whereas I see obfuscation and the run-around elsewhere.

My sincere hope is that Meryl Nass will be straightforward, rational and go straight to the issue, as I know that you would.

Thank you,

AP

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/if-the-good-guys-cant-resolve-their/comment/55254588

Expand full comment

I would trust Meryl ahead of the Baileys. The harm the Baileys, Kaufman, Young etc have done with their dangerous nonsense they have created to divert attention from out what is the truth, is IMHO a calamity against humankind!

Expand full comment

Meryl is actively using bad information and links to bolster her comments to me. Sam Bailey has not done so. The only person who is actively being untruthful is Meryl.

Expand full comment

Public service add-on,

Dr. Bailey wisely neglected to mention that Ivermectin (under its' various names) is a fertility suppresant of choice for the 'developing' world. The Gates foundation and WHO love Ivermectin. Should Samantha explicitly draw attention to covert birth control methods, that would be the end of her platform - because exponential population growth is real. Take her advice and stay away from Ivermection. FYI: it's very real toxicity is magnified in the presence of other compounds promoted by the freedom community.

Expand full comment

I believe you

Expand full comment

It's such a shame that we have to live in a world that bombards us with endless lies and psychological operations. It's disgusting.

Expand full comment

I'm not saying it's a perfect drug but think about this in the context of how con-vid (pre vax) was killing people around life expectancy (meaning it was normal death rates):

-without ivm , majority of old people died and attributed to covid

-with ivm, about 50% got better and survived past that (but who knows if they got hurt by the 💉)

Basically, if given ivm at around the age of life expectancy, those people lived longer than those that did not get it.

Even though con-vid was a sham, we got to see how an old drug was able to increase life span. Perhaps it helps people who are already loaded up with crap pharma drugs and flu shots etc.

There's also another anti parasitic drug that's been successful with people fighting cancer. Makes you wonder what is happening... Is it killing the parasites or is it helping the body eliminate the crap that the parasites were there for? Hopefully we find out in the near future... https://fenbendazole.substack.com/

Expand full comment

Old, & young health compromised, sick nursing home residents Die by the thousands in nursing home across the USA every freaking year of the Influenza and related pneumonia. Absolutely Zero Media coverage for many decades.

The c19 Propaganda Terror Campaign recharacterized this to an Ignorant public and even death by gun shot, sky diving and auto accidents were covid lies. Our Representatives passed laws ahead of time in this plan, that incentivised using Medicare money to pay hospitals to do this...and to apply the Fauci protocol to kill c19 identified patients. Excess of $100k+ for each death by Remdesivir. There's a list of $ awards by states online. The entire health & medical sector has been turned into a mass murder machine... You will be shocked about just how much hospitals in unexpected states made or profited by murdering our fellow citizens and loved ones.

Everything about the Pandemic was & IS A LIE.

Expand full comment

Yep, it was a huge lie.

But it's pretty odd that Ivermectin actually helped people live longer than life expectancy in these extreme cases, right?

I'm not saying to take it if you're healthy, but it sure does help people recover if they're already sick.

I've taken it a few times to test it out before having it at the ready in case family needs it. I had no side effects at all even at a higher dose. The range of effective dose compared to dangerous dose is very wide for ivermectin, wider than most OTC pharma drugs! That means it's very safe, like cannabis is too. Obviously there's possible issues with habitual use, which is why I think some that take ivermectin continuously can have issues.

But for occasional sicknesses it's not going to be detrimental like the obsessives think...

Expand full comment