Since the early 1900s, the medical industry has embraced the germ “theory” paradigm even though the scientific literature has not supported the concept of pathogens. With regard to stomach problems such as gastritis and ulcers it is no different and in this case the scapegoat is the bacteria Helicobacter pylori.
Took about 2 years of keto. And about 70 kilos of saurkraut alongside meat and some Brazilian herbs. Now I can even do coffee without ANY bad effects upon my gut!
Get your microbiome in order and witness THE MIRACLES ;)
Yes. Keto diet, one huge meal a day, to get you into the ketogenic state! Body then heals itself.
But one has to throw out ALL the carbs (veggie oils too), otherwise body will remain in a glucoholic state and will continue to "torture itself" by trying to work on a poisonous input...
Fly larva, aka maggots, eat only decaying flesh, typically on external surfaces where flies can land & lay their eggs, while bacteria eat dead cells on the inside. Qq
Antibiotics are effectively internal pesticides. Taking them to kill bacteria is equivalent to spraying maggots with a can of RAID. Destruction of either leaves the dead tissues and cells behind to be colonized by other microbes unaffected by the applied toxic substance, or other opportunistic microbes, such as yeast & fungus. But these too are seen as a problem to be solved with drugs. Meanwhile the cause, the food source for various opportunistic microbes, the dead cells & tissues, remain. Scavengers often come along & consume a dead carcass laying around, and that's the end of it. But what happens when dead cells and tissues remain inside the body after all bacteria, yeast, fungus and even parasites have been repeatedly destroyed (all over the body, not just the site of in-fection), by prescription drugs, over and over, again and again? Lots of things. Bad things. Including the onset of AIDS, and encapsulation of dead cells, aka cancer.
Wait, repeatedly? Where do new bacteria, yeast & fungus come from after previous ones have been destroyed throughout the body by drugs? It's not like with maggots, how other flies happen along and lay another batch of eggs. How about from external drug resistant variants and their carriers who wander by like the fly and cough on you, as virus theory claims? Yeah, sure. You betcha..
Pharma & allopathic medicine have hung on to failed 1800's germ theory because it's profitable, not because it's good medicine or good science.
I suggest listening to all of Sam's podcasts to learn more.
An excellent summary, and as the good book says, "worthy of all acceptation." It seems helpful to me to think of bacteria as indoor maggots. By indoor I mean inside the body. So you've assisted me, and I thank you. I'm a big fan of maggots, and perhaps if I needed a totem animal it should be the maggot, that heroic and lovely creature that takes care of the hind end of life's adventures. My native name could be Dave Wiggling Maggot (Dave Standing Bare wasn't working for me.) The maggot is a sort of wingless hyena who does such marvelous work for her ecosystem that she is eventually granted angel wings. People who need a religion could do worse than worship the angel-winged maggot. Amen? All humans in the West who have ever been offered against-life chemicals (antibios) have had to overcome their own desire to ask the obvious question about how the against-life chemicals know how to kill just that one bad thing. Don't they sort of kill everything? And you've shown us how that plays out. Basically antibiotics are Arnold Schwarzenegger in I think it was Commando, circa 1980, going in with a duffel bag of machine guns and shooting up the joint. --from Shooting Up, by Dave
It's not how big your postulate is, but how you use it.
Dr. Koch sounds confident when he's stripped to his postulates, but in life he tended to prevaricate and even add postulates to try to get them to fit in with the allopaths' assumptions.
For my part, I like how Sam and Mark deploy the postulates to ask simply:
Can you find these germs and then can you prove that they have any real impact on the body?
Even simpler is my version:
Can you get a good look at these puppies and then can you watch them actually sickening a human?
Really, when it comes down to it all, Koch's postulates are also simplified protocols for statistically designed experiments used for ANY experimental work. Anyone who has EVER taken basic statistics and then gone on to the subsequent DESIGNED experimental courses of statistics learns how to plan and run experiments and make conclusions ONLY after proving statistical(!) significance of a null theory.
Any of the studies which FAIL to do so(most these days from what I hear) are at best doing pseudo-science and most likely pushing false narratives in the name of. . . money.
Yeah I hear you though I've never had a stats course. My lay version of what you're saying is a philosopher's take, which is that we can run thought experiments based on probability and plausibility. Although statistics are fun in their own way.
Koch's postulates are a rigorous distillation of the principle of agency when applied to infection. But it's possible to distill the postulates even further and see that they are (in spirit at least) probing the limits of the human condition. The more universal question lurking behind the postulates is: do things happen to us or do we make them happen?
Thanks for all you do to bring sanity and common sense to medicine.
H. pylori the terrible culprit causing stomach ulcers. right.
Just now, hearing the FACT the this bacteria is resident in nearly all humans' stomach while only SOME have ulcers should have made these doctors think twice.
My longterm readers are familiar with my licking urinals during the biggest plague in a century.
In that sense, I salute this guy snorting a bit of goober to test for himself, and I recognize a fellow auto-experimentalist doctor. My licking experiments were more extensive, however, taking place over at least two years and in multiple locations, so I'm a little surprised that I haven't already received a Nobel.
I appreciate your tip about blinding--during the next plague I might add to my field trials by going blindfolded into public washrooms. The trick will be to make sure I get the gender right before entering. I could wear a skirt just in case, though I'm six-foot-four and even long skirts tend to be mini-skirts on me. The best science isn't just blind, it's double blind, so I'd be happy to have a sidekick if anyone out there feels inclined. The visuals on "double-blind" are a Three Stooges stooge sticking two fingers in the eyes of another stooge (cuz science).
Last week, my freedom group had a meeting, and via a discussion of the recent announcement by Dr Mike Yeadon;s recent statement that he is convinced there is no evidence for respiratory and other viruses, we ended up talking about the Fan Wu and Peng Zhou papers mentioned in A Farewell to Virology. One participant kept trying to explain away critiques of those papers. It basically ended up with this participant expressing incredulity that the fraudulent nature of virology which was quite evident has not made the entire science collapse like a house of cards, making this person feel like there must be some sort of truth to it which we're missing.
What you discuss here, Sam, regarding Marshal's experiments and followup in fact shows why the collapse has not happened. The unscientific nature of his original study, starting with the inability to satisfy the actual first Koch Postulate, is astounding, Really comes down to $$$, or whatever currency you use. A lot of that is spent propping up the lie, and practitioners are trained to believe in the pseudo science they're subjected to for years and years, undergo peer pressure to conform, and are taught since early age to focus on the monetary rewards which accrue to those who conform. Once again, thanks so much. 🙏🏼 💖
I've been following Barbara O'Neill from Australia who explained the h-pilori "problem". She said in one of her lectures that it's a bacteria that helps us with digestion. The problem is when it's done it's job, our stomach acids destroy it. When people drink while eating this makes it impossible to kill it off and it proliferates causing indigestion, gastritis etc. So when you eat wait, an hour before drinking and problem solved. I love your videos Dr Sam Bailey. Keep them coming.
Thank you again for another brilliant production!! Dr. Sam dives deep into the belly of the Germ Theory beast, clinically exposing the bile that has fermented around the causes of gastritis. Cutting deep into Germ Theory‘s mucosal layers, Sam reveals again the ulcers of animal torture experiments, to “prove“ the a priori assumptions of H Pylori‘s “pathogenicity.“ Each line of commentary reveals pearls of wisdom, throwing light on the colossal stupidity and destruction caused by the allopathic paradigm that peddles the hoax that germs are malevolent and must be repressed at all costs by profitable, toxic, and often deadly treatments.
Jeez, seeing that abusive bastard go after a pig with a weapon, even though it might just be a stock image, tells you everything you need to know about whether our species is really seeking health in its own ecosystem. You don't even need to see the incarcerated apes to know that medical research is the opposite of health--they had me [at least] at just one pig.
I had them. Now I dont.
Took about 2 years of keto. And about 70 kilos of saurkraut alongside meat and some Brazilian herbs. Now I can even do coffee without ANY bad effects upon my gut!
Get your microbiome in order and witness THE MIRACLES ;)
are you referring to a single meal?
Yes. Keto diet, one huge meal a day, to get you into the ketogenic state! Body then heals itself.
But one has to throw out ALL the carbs (veggie oils too), otherwise body will remain in a glucoholic state and will continue to "torture itself" by trying to work on a poisonous input...
All you java junkies should check yourself into Maxwell House and detox. The caffeine 'shakes' should go away in a few days.
"infected...asymptomatic" or as I like to say it: "perfectly healthy"
Fly larva, aka maggots, eat only decaying flesh, typically on external surfaces where flies can land & lay their eggs, while bacteria eat dead cells on the inside. Qq
Antibiotics are effectively internal pesticides. Taking them to kill bacteria is equivalent to spraying maggots with a can of RAID. Destruction of either leaves the dead tissues and cells behind to be colonized by other microbes unaffected by the applied toxic substance, or other opportunistic microbes, such as yeast & fungus. But these too are seen as a problem to be solved with drugs. Meanwhile the cause, the food source for various opportunistic microbes, the dead cells & tissues, remain. Scavengers often come along & consume a dead carcass laying around, and that's the end of it. But what happens when dead cells and tissues remain inside the body after all bacteria, yeast, fungus and even parasites have been repeatedly destroyed (all over the body, not just the site of in-fection), by prescription drugs, over and over, again and again? Lots of things. Bad things. Including the onset of AIDS, and encapsulation of dead cells, aka cancer.
Wait, repeatedly? Where do new bacteria, yeast & fungus come from after previous ones have been destroyed throughout the body by drugs? It's not like with maggots, how other flies happen along and lay another batch of eggs. How about from external drug resistant variants and their carriers who wander by like the fly and cough on you, as virus theory claims? Yeah, sure. You betcha..
Pharma & allopathic medicine have hung on to failed 1800's germ theory because it's profitable, not because it's good medicine or good science.
I suggest listening to all of Sam's podcasts to learn more.
An excellent summary, and as the good book says, "worthy of all acceptation." It seems helpful to me to think of bacteria as indoor maggots. By indoor I mean inside the body. So you've assisted me, and I thank you. I'm a big fan of maggots, and perhaps if I needed a totem animal it should be the maggot, that heroic and lovely creature that takes care of the hind end of life's adventures. My native name could be Dave Wiggling Maggot (Dave Standing Bare wasn't working for me.) The maggot is a sort of wingless hyena who does such marvelous work for her ecosystem that she is eventually granted angel wings. People who need a religion could do worse than worship the angel-winged maggot. Amen? All humans in the West who have ever been offered against-life chemicals (antibios) have had to overcome their own desire to ask the obvious question about how the against-life chemicals know how to kill just that one bad thing. Don't they sort of kill everything? And you've shown us how that plays out. Basically antibiotics are Arnold Schwarzenegger in I think it was Commando, circa 1980, going in with a duffel bag of machine guns and shooting up the joint. --from Shooting Up, by Dave
It's not how big your postulate is, but how you use it.
Dr. Koch sounds confident when he's stripped to his postulates, but in life he tended to prevaricate and even add postulates to try to get them to fit in with the allopaths' assumptions.
For my part, I like how Sam and Mark deploy the postulates to ask simply:
Can you find these germs and then can you prove that they have any real impact on the body?
Even simpler is my version:
Can you get a good look at these puppies and then can you watch them actually sickening a human?
[Thor's postulate! Not big, but well deployed.]
Really, when it comes down to it all, Koch's postulates are also simplified protocols for statistically designed experiments used for ANY experimental work. Anyone who has EVER taken basic statistics and then gone on to the subsequent DESIGNED experimental courses of statistics learns how to plan and run experiments and make conclusions ONLY after proving statistical(!) significance of a null theory.
Any of the studies which FAIL to do so(most these days from what I hear) are at best doing pseudo-science and most likely pushing false narratives in the name of. . . money.
Yeah I hear you though I've never had a stats course. My lay version of what you're saying is a philosopher's take, which is that we can run thought experiments based on probability and plausibility. Although statistics are fun in their own way.
Nice work!
Ode to H. Pylori Haters
Why be uncharitable, to defenseless small germs,
When worthier targets lurk, in Big Pharma firms.
Gastritis and peptic ulcers, are a big deal,
Affecting half of us, after each meal.
The first red flag for gastritis, is out in the open,
Published lies on Wiki, from the Germ Theory showman.
H. Pylori is pathogenic, be there spin,
Sam deftly consigned that, to the fraud bin.
Her living, breathing, gallery of great work,
Has seen off, the Germ Theory jerk.
But vested interests, need this fraud to make hay,
With mandated treatments, from taxes we pay.
Another fave spin be, the asymptomatic superspreader,
Better watch out!! For this lethal fella!!
Sam‘s work has exposed, through a full spectrum probe,
Koch‘s postulates never fulfilled, for any microbe.
Marshall‘s 85 paper fell, on Koch‘s first postulate,
So a Japanese team, had a go with a primate.
Nothing but monkey business, on 4 Rhesus souls,
Totured with Ketamine, and Pylori “poles.“
No valid controls, Fukuda‘s methods unsound,
Just abuse of monkeys, grimly profound.
In true Germ Theory spirit, he concluded a priori,
That gastritis is caused by, H. Pylori.
One flawed study after another, Sam picks apart,
Upsetting the gravy train, of the allopathic apple cart.
An opus magnus of work, she reveals again and again,
That microbes arent pathogenic, just a response to Terrain.
Koch's postulates are a rigorous distillation of the principle of agency when applied to infection. But it's possible to distill the postulates even further and see that they are (in spirit at least) probing the limits of the human condition. The more universal question lurking behind the postulates is: do things happen to us or do we make them happen?
Great video Dr Sam.
Thanks for all you do to bring sanity and common sense to medicine.
H. pylori the terrible culprit causing stomach ulcers. right.
Just now, hearing the FACT the this bacteria is resident in nearly all humans' stomach while only SOME have ulcers should have made these doctors think twice.
It all makes sense now.
My longterm readers are familiar with my licking urinals during the biggest plague in a century.
In that sense, I salute this guy snorting a bit of goober to test for himself, and I recognize a fellow auto-experimentalist doctor. My licking experiments were more extensive, however, taking place over at least two years and in multiple locations, so I'm a little surprised that I haven't already received a Nobel.
I appreciate your tip about blinding--during the next plague I might add to my field trials by going blindfolded into public washrooms. The trick will be to make sure I get the gender right before entering. I could wear a skirt just in case, though I'm six-foot-four and even long skirts tend to be mini-skirts on me. The best science isn't just blind, it's double blind, so I'd be happy to have a sidekick if anyone out there feels inclined. The visuals on "double-blind" are a Three Stooges stooge sticking two fingers in the eyes of another stooge (cuz science).
I’ve been a goof for a long time.
If you run really fast and use a butterfly net - yes you can catch em
Just because the organism is present at the scene of the crime doesn't prove they're guilty of its commission.
It would be like saying police at a crime scene are guilty.
Mind you, one shouldn't exclude the possibility!
Last week, my freedom group had a meeting, and via a discussion of the recent announcement by Dr Mike Yeadon;s recent statement that he is convinced there is no evidence for respiratory and other viruses, we ended up talking about the Fan Wu and Peng Zhou papers mentioned in A Farewell to Virology. One participant kept trying to explain away critiques of those papers. It basically ended up with this participant expressing incredulity that the fraudulent nature of virology which was quite evident has not made the entire science collapse like a house of cards, making this person feel like there must be some sort of truth to it which we're missing.
What you discuss here, Sam, regarding Marshal's experiments and followup in fact shows why the collapse has not happened. The unscientific nature of his original study, starting with the inability to satisfy the actual first Koch Postulate, is astounding, Really comes down to $$$, or whatever currency you use. A lot of that is spent propping up the lie, and practitioners are trained to believe in the pseudo science they're subjected to for years and years, undergo peer pressure to conform, and are taught since early age to focus on the monetary rewards which accrue to those who conform. Once again, thanks so much. 🙏🏼 💖
I've been following Barbara O'Neill from Australia who explained the h-pilori "problem". She said in one of her lectures that it's a bacteria that helps us with digestion. The problem is when it's done it's job, our stomach acids destroy it. When people drink while eating this makes it impossible to kill it off and it proliferates causing indigestion, gastritis etc. So when you eat wait, an hour before drinking and problem solved. I love your videos Dr Sam Bailey. Keep them coming.
Thank you again for another brilliant production!! Dr. Sam dives deep into the belly of the Germ Theory beast, clinically exposing the bile that has fermented around the causes of gastritis. Cutting deep into Germ Theory‘s mucosal layers, Sam reveals again the ulcers of animal torture experiments, to “prove“ the a priori assumptions of H Pylori‘s “pathogenicity.“ Each line of commentary reveals pearls of wisdom, throwing light on the colossal stupidity and destruction caused by the allopathic paradigm that peddles the hoax that germs are malevolent and must be repressed at all costs by profitable, toxic, and often deadly treatments.
Jeez, seeing that abusive bastard go after a pig with a weapon, even though it might just be a stock image, tells you everything you need to know about whether our species is really seeking health in its own ecosystem. You don't even need to see the incarcerated apes to know that medical research is the opposite of health--they had me [at least] at just one pig.
Some of the great doctors who have had the courage to test experimental treatments on themselves:
Albert Schweitzer 1952 Humanitarianism; Tested yellow fever thingie
Werner Forßmann 1956 Cardiac catheterization; Cardiac catheterized himself to show it could be done safely.
Rosalyn Yalow 1977 ACTH; Tested her own blood in her ACTH research
Barry Marshall 2005 Helicobacter pylori and ulcers; Drank a culture of H. pylori
David Thor 2021-2023 No-virus researcher; Licked public urinals repeatedly to prove there was no pandemic. Has not yet been awarded the Nobel prize.