97 Comments
User's avatar
Ngungu's avatar

The Healthcare system is a hoax: it is a HealthScare system, or perhaps I should say a HealthScar system.

Paul Bruce's avatar

The health-scare system indeed, and all about scaring the naive and gullible among us who are open to the nonsensical belief that somehow harmful treatments and poisonous medications are what we need to be healthy and prosper! Their scare system fear-porn leads to more treatments, medications, tablets, chemo, vaccines, and look … $$$$$ - what a coincidence!

Ngungu's avatar

The naive and gullible are entitled to expect their doctors and other healthcare provisioners to be trustworthy, similar to expecting that a government and parliament look after the interests of "we the people".

As a lucky side-effect, the planned Covid scamdemic has shown that neither doctors, nor other healthcare provisioners nor government nor parliament look after the interests of "we the people". Sadly, there are still many who continue to believe the bunk narratives – the mis/dis/malinformation – those 4 categories of "authorities" continue to spread scrupulously, blatantly, with a straight face.

Paul Bruce's avatar

"The naive and gullible are entitled to expect their doctors and other healthcare provisioners to be trustworthy" – very true, and we were all that way, of course, at one time, with many only waking up during the Covid scamdemic, as you say. It is quite a shock when you find the truth that we are being lied to when it comes to health, as we all expect politicians to lie as that's what they do, but not so much health professionals – it was a big wake-up call for me for sure.

Ngungu's avatar

I agree 100% and can tell you that I only woke up thanks to Covid. When there was talk about jabbing people, my wife immediately said she would not take it, for no other reasons that she does not trust doctors due to another medical event.

I was a bit hesitant but soon started to wake up. Then our family doctor called 1 day and said "I'm calling to make an appointment for you and your wife to come and have the vaccines". As everybody was only too happy to be protected against such a virus as had never occurred before, he expected me to discuss a convenient date. Instead I told him we don't want the "vaccine" (he could not see the quotation marks of course 😀), and he said "really, you don't want it?", and I confirmed. He was blown away.

Paul Bruce's avatar

Great that your wife had learnt from her previous medical event, as not all do. Also, you making it clear to the doctor - "We don't want the vaccine" as I believe there were many who didn't want the experimental shot but were maybe too scared of refusing. Have to be firm and say "no", nothing else, just say you don't want it as you did and if any raised voice or anger from the doctor/nurse, you get angry back and shout back etc, as your body your choice not your body their choice as many doctors/nurses seem to think. It's sad that many buckled because of pressure from either a doctor/nurse, employer, or even their spouse! Well done to you and your wife as was far from easy at that time.

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 24
Comment removed
Ngungu's avatar

Commenting for the sake of commenting? Find someone else.

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 24
Comment removed
Ngungu's avatar

In a system that is thoroughly corrupt, good behaviors will not change it. What is needed is a thorough clean-up of the system, and since it is a worldwide system that won't be easy, nor can I see a solution.

Baldmichael's avatar

I used to think health professionals generally were competent with your best interest at heart.

Now I realise they want your heart at best interest!

Health professionals anagrams to:

- fash lethal poisoners

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 24
Comment removed
Baldmichael's avatar

True, although mechanics are considered trades people. Profession as a word anagrams to this one single longest word, 'poisoners'. Makes all professions look suspect! The next longest are:

- erosions

- opsonise

- poisoner

- poorness

- ropiness

- snoopers

- snoopier

- spoofers

Doesn't look good for professions!

Antibody Positive 🇺🇸's avatar

As a healthcare professional it’s understandable to believe we are doing no harm. We are shown evidence that the system works. And if you question things you get shunned.

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 24
Comment removed
Ngungu's avatar

I did not say there were no good doctors! But they are few and far between and they cannot fix a broken system. Proof: Sam and her husband Mark were good licenced doctors but they could not survive in that corrupt system.

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 24
Comment removed
Ngungu's avatar

I added the word "not". I did it on purpose to see if you were awake 😉 🤣 Thanks anyway for pointing it out.

BTW, the broad brush in my previous comment was done on purpose because the overwhelming majority of doctors are part of and actively support that system. If I did not think there were any good doctors at all I would not listen to Sam's vids nor would I comment.

Baldmichael's avatar

Yes, and perhaps also a Wealthscare System as it scares people out of their wealth. I see 'Healthcare system' will anagram to:

- ah er alchemy tests

It turns dross like the various tests into gold.

- a schemer stealthy

Which sums it up nicely.

- ahem, scythe alerts

It reaps what it sows, the seeds of death.

Ngungu's avatar

Good one !! 👍

Gram's avatar

Yep! The real scare is now with wearables, implants, devices... merging humans with machines... the transhumanist agenda brought to you by Big tech-pharma-banksters-gov. A 60-something friend showed me a brochure rec'd at recent appt, about an implant the size of a quarter. She is 'deciding' if she wants it implanted under her skin to monitor cholesterol. wth?

Ngungu's avatar

Tell her that the cholesterol narrative is another hoax from the pharmaceutical industry because there is big money in it as they got so many people fobic about it.

Ask her: if cholesterol is bad, why does our own body produce it?

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 24
Comment removed
Ngungu's avatar

Nope. If there is external intake of cholesterol, the liver will reduce cholesterol production proportionally.

Antibody Positive 🇺🇸's avatar

It’s so disappointing finding out that our elected government officials on both sides are aware of what is going in that’s making us sick but keeping quiet.

Ngungu's avatar

That's because they are part of the scam. Remember, the entire system of Big Biz (pharma, Banking, etc.) and government is a thoroughly corrupt, interlocking, revolving door theater to keep us distracted and believing that they have our best interests at heart. Proof: Covid.

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 24
Comment removed
Ngungu's avatar

You call it evidence, I call it proof, esp. since the CDC and others have admitted things they denied before.

I'marealperson's avatar

I would say both :)

Antibody Positive 🇺🇸's avatar

It does work for heart attacks, strokes, trauma and acute problems. Just not great at long term issues.

Gram's avatar

Breaks and tears, yes.

Ngungu's avatar

I would classify heart attacks, strokes, trauma as long term issues 😉

Antibody Positive 🇺🇸's avatar

Yes, but we get them out of the acute phase.

Ngungu's avatar

Yes, but "they" don't want to get them out of the problem because keeping them dependent on drugs is a lot more rewarding financially.

Just ask yourself: we are more advanced technologically than ever before in the history of mankind, yet we have more heart attacks, strokes, trauma than ever before. Why is that?

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 24
Comment removed
Ngungu's avatar

Yes, they happen in seconds but that does not mean the issue is solved, gone, to be archived as it were.

Definition of trauma:

1. any physical damage to the body caused by violence or accident or fracture etc.

2. an emotional wound or shock often having long-lasting effects

1. may or may not be long-lasting, 2. is.

So, calling trauma "very very" different when long-lasting effects are discussed is a nonsensical remark.

Lilian - Reality of Illness's avatar

Dear Sam, the website of The Perth Group is offline for some time so the link "HIV – a virus like no other, The Perth Group, 12 Jul 2017" doesn't work.

I've uploaded the PDF here a while ago, maybe you can upload it as well on your excellent site: https://odysee.com/@LiPhi:7/TPGVirusLikeNoOther:6

Lilian - Reality of Illness's avatar

Overhere in the Netherlands it doesn´t, no matter which browser I use. And that´s for quite some time already so.

Alexandra Addams's avatar

This was such a welcome video as I have two friends who spend more time at the GP's surgery getting tests like BP and taking whatever is prescribed on a regular basis, and blood tests to ensure they are well??? if they feel well then why are they taking these tests? because the GP recommends them of course! My best friend died last month from an enlarged heart which was coming on over a period of at least 18 months. His diet was atrocious and I constantly tried to get him looking into more healthy food. He got lazy and then started losing weight because of his on/off desire to cook anything nutritious. He wouldn't go to a doctor because we saw the problems in 2020 and onwards, and we didn't test, wear masks, get a jab or stay indoors for long periods. We didn't follow the science as it was presented. We did research and listened to reason. So he was loathe to go and see the GP about losing weight and get a recommendation simply because of the way the pandemic played out and was anxious about doctors from then on. So doctors can be knowledgeable and help their patients find a way forward, or they can stop them from trusting the medical institutions but have little idea where to go from there. I will be recommending my friends watch this video Dr Sam, because it was so succinct and hit the nail on the head without rambling and putting the viewer off. Thank you so much for your insights and books. I really appreciate your thoroughness and diligence in educating us.

Factscinator's avatar

🎬🔥 COMING SOON TO “GetSickz” Pictures 🔥🎬

🧪📊 SCREENING TRAP: DETECTION OF NON-EXISTENT PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS 📊🧪

From the award-winning minds behind

“Virus Isolation: Circular Reasoning = Proof”

and “Test First, Evidence Never”…

…comes the groundbreaking blockbuster that transforms the possibility of illness into lifelong treatment plans, premium subscriptions… and just one more test.

🌍 In a world where “normal” is just a setting waiting to be updated… one industry dares to ask:

👉 “What if everyone is already a patient?”

🎭 Starring:

🧠 The Overzealous Analyzer — “Your levels are… technically concerning.”

📈 The Slightly Elevated Marker — “It doesn’t matter if you feel fine.”

💳 The Insurance Oracle — “Approved… with enthusiasm.”

🗣️ Critics are raving:

⭐ “I went in for peace of mind… left with a subscription plan!”

⭐ “They found something. They always do.”

⭐ “Five stars — I didn’t even know I was sick!”

🎥 This summer…

Don’t wait for symptoms.

Don’t trust how you feel.

Don’t question the chart.

💰 Because if they can measure it…they can monetize it… and you.

🧾 SCREENING TRAP: FINDING PROBLEMS YOU NEVER HAD

📺 Now screening in clinics, apps… and annual checkups everywhere.

parameter9's avatar

Will you consider doing a spot on 'genetic' testing and 'genetic conditions' because they are considered a 'slam-dunk' I would find that difficult to dismiss without much more information. Things like the BRCA1/2 gene which is closely associated with endocrine disease (so called). Woman are being cut up because of this particular test so could we see the wood for the trees and clarify this. Thanks for all your detailed takes and deep enquiry. You are priceless.

Farming's avatar

DNA is fraud at best and witchcraft at worst. Many are onto it. Dr Tom Cowen for one. The 'Discovery'. https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2021/12/15/dna-discovery-extraction-and-structure-a-critical-review/…

A critical review of ‘DNA’ testing.

https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2025/01/30/critical-review-of-dna-test

Factscinator's avatar

I couldn't agree more. Once you grasp that DNA and RNA have never been conclusively proven to exist—unless you consider torturing biological materials with toxic chemicals to produce a distorted precipitate as ’isolation’—the entire edifice of viroLIEgy collapses. 

The Definition of ’Virus’ Intracellular obligate parasite with a strand of DNA/RNA enclosed in a proteinaceous coat. No DNA/RNA = No Virus.

This revelation shatters the foundations of bioweapons, gain-of-fiction, PCR, genetics, and the central dogma of molecular biology itself. Name any of them—they all hinge on the unquestioned assumption that DNA and RNA are real, distinct entities.

Bioweapons/Gain of Fiction – How can you engineer a pathogen when its supposed genetic blueprint is a fabrication? No genome to modify means no engineered superbugs, just a super scam.

PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) – If there’s no actual DNA/RNA, what exactly is being amplified?

Genetics – The entire field hinges on the idea that hereditary information is encoded in DNA/RNA.

The Central Dogma of Molecular Biology – If DNA doesn’t dictate protein synthesis via RNA, the whole ’dogma’ is just another myth.

Without DNA/RNA as a verified entity, these fields dissolve into pseudoscience propped up by assumption, manipulation, and circular reasoning.

In addition to your wonderful links these will help demystify some of the claims surrounding DNA ’isolation,’ ’genetic’ science, and the PCR fiction in easy-to-digest steps. Eye−opening stuff!! 

https://dokumen.pub/critical-check-writings-by-tam-on-dna-pcr-and-structure-of-living-cell-dna-discovery-extraction-and-structure-pcr-and-real-time-rt-pcr-under-critical-review-why-you-should-know-about-harold-hillmans-work-on-the-living-cell.html

The second link features Tom taking a humorous look at the Human Genome Project, including a hilarious story about someone who sent in a pet’s ’genetic’ material to 23andMe (it was his)—only to have the results come back showing his ‘lineage’ as a mix of different dog breeds:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/2Ddan3C4PbNw

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 24
Comment removed
Factscinator's avatar

Hello, let’s start with DNA. 🧬

Please describe the steps used to isolate “DNA,” then explain how that fraud differs from the fraud known as “virus isolation.” 🤔🔬

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 24
Comment removed
Factscinator's avatar

You didn’t answer my question. 🤔

So here it is again:

Please describe the actual steps used to isolate “DNA,” then explain how that fraud differs from the fraud known as “virus isolation.” 🔬🧬

You’ve stated: “Have studied genetics extensively.” So answering my question should be a walk in the park for you. 😉

chris evans's avatar

I am 79 and have had a healthy life until recently. Apart from BCCs that were simply removed surgically, a result of too much Sun, I was told, I also was told that I needed a needle inserted into my left eye because of macular degeneration I stopped that treatment and instead took supplements particular to eye health. I have, in the past few years been finding my sleep, interrupted by frequent urination and having to use the toilet 4 times a night. I had heard of the PSA test for detection of possible prostate cancer, which can occur at my age. I was recommended a book by the man, Richard Amblin PhD who claimed he invented the original PSA test and declared it not reliable as a test for cancer. He details the strange workings of the FDA and their approval, process.

pobrecollie's avatar

The 5 year survival rate scam.

Ramp up over sensitive cancer tests.

Catch more cancers, the majority of them will be harmless. Treat them anyway.

5 year survival rates show big improvements, but in the real world deaths from cancer stay the same. Many people put through unnecessary fear and treatments.

Scaler Wave's avatar

Once you realize that MD's are mostly just Pharma shills, it's obvious that the tests are just a part of the scam.

James Schweibinz's avatar

Several people urged me to get a colonoscopy. No way. Then a friend told me of someone she knew who got a colonoscopy and after the procedure had a colon problem caused by the invasive procedure.

Sandra Elam's avatar

I knew someone whose colon was damaged during a "routine" colonoscopy. That's one reason why I never got one. I think they tried to normalize colonoscopies with the massive media coverage of President Reagan's colonoscopy and polyp removal.

Steve  Mitzner's avatar

I read one MD's advice against colonoscopies for most people! Citing the chance of mass damage vs. saveing ones life. The numbers were [ I think] it will save 1 in 25,000 vs it can kill or harm 1 in 20,000! The never pushed, non-invasive 90+% accurate Cologuard DNA test won't poke a hole in your gut or infect you! If you test positive, then it may be time for a colonoscopy.

See: John McDougall, MD, "Colonoscopy: A Gold Standard to Refuse." @

https://www.drmcdougall.com/education/information/colonoscopy-a-gold-standard-to-refuse/

vee cord's avatar

Exactly Sam!! BRAVO...all these tests are their way to ensnare you and get you on the allopathic treatment merry-go-round for LIFE! stay away...or woe unto you🤔🙋‍♂️

Ellasquared's avatar

Also back in the day when I was 15 (62) my parents put me in a psych ward for anorexia and they did a whole bunch of neurologic and psych tests on me. I was put on Dilantin for the EEG showing some waveforms and after a year of taking that I ask my mother why I was taking it and she didn't even really know so I stopped taking it. Fast forward to my first son who started having absence seizures at the age of two (at least that's when I first noticed because I was home I'm maternity leave with my second baby). I had learned about vaccines but was bullied into them by my then husband and provide providers even though I was a nurse and nurse midwife free student, where one of my classmates handed me an 8 1/2 x 11 envelope filled with several articles about the dangers of vaccines (was 1996) but when it came time I couldn't articulate my concerns and so I caved to the bullying. When I finally "convinced" my peds nurse practitioner that I was seeing this activity because back then we didn't have video on our phone and they were so short and sporadic that I couldn't "prove" to her what I was seeing even though later the neurologist said I described it perfectly. I had read about this in nursing school that kids with absence seizures were often mislabeled as behavior problems because they appeared to be rolling their eyes. The neurologist when she learned of my history told me oh yeah back then we treated that EEG, now we would never do that without actual symptoms of activity. . Strange when they test asymptomatic people for any number of conditions and treat the test, not the person, because when tests are negative, doctors are "baffled" and just say well nothing is wrong because tests are negative. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny has talked a lot about this. She was the one who finally made it possible for me to advocate for myself and my children and cave because knowledge is better than belief. Many thanks to you and Mark for leaving the system and sharing what you've learned with everyone. I always told my own patients "it's not your doctor, it's the system".

Ngungu's avatar

"Asymptomatic" does not exist, it is just a term to desperately try to jack up the diseased numbers by adding in healthy people and saying they don't have the symptoms but do carry the virus ... that does not exist. Proof: Covid.

ShieldMaiden's avatar

THANK YOU, Drs. Bailey, for your continuing and courageous efforts to shine a light in the shadows of allopathy.

patbuckley's avatar

the medical business is well out of control now - all the tests, people have become OBSESSED with 'finding things early', and it is (imo) an excuse to diagnose as many 'cases' as possible (one in two now advertised in UK 'but together we are beating cancer' they tell us), and get people proudly on treatments. What a merry go round.

Ellasquared's avatar

I was a practitioner and It became even more clear during c🤪vid just how much practitioners do not use observation and listening skills but rely solely on tests. They could have a very sick person in front of them and scratch their heads because "the tests are negative". I've been in the anti-vaccine movement for three decades and in working with mothers and babies, I started noticing that when tests were negative, this was a clear sign of vaccine injury.

Steven Johnston's avatar

I ignore all invitations from the NHS to screening tests (and I've had quite a few, being of a certain age). As far as I am concerned, they are likely to find something that isn't there.

Brian Gavigan's avatar

Yes, it's called Money.

Sandra Elam's avatar

Thank you for this analysis. I realized that medical screening tests are designed to funnel people into the medikill system. I stopped all mammograms more than 10 years ago because they were so painful I thought they surely damage tissue. I managed to dodge colonoscopies also; first, by delaying, and later by refusing to participate in any screening tests, after I saw the murderous agenda of the medikill system during the 2020 scamdemic.